California will spend about $88.5 million on last-mile broadband projects using federal funding from the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act, the California Public Utilities Commission decided at a Thursday meeting. Commissioners voted 5-0 for resolution T-17826 to spend $44.1 million on unserved areas in Imperial, Lassen and Plumas counties. They also voted unanimously for resolution T-17829 to spend $44.4 million on unserved areas in Alameda, San Francisco and Sierra counties, including an Oakland project that especially received support from local officials and community groups in comments during the meeting. Awardees included Golden State Connect Authority and Plumas-Sierra Telecommunications and the cities of Oakland, Fremont and San Francisco. The CPUC proposed the resolutions last month (see 2406070073). "These projects are a shining example of our state's broadband-for-all values and objectives," CPUC President Alice Reynolds at the livestreamed meeting said. She praised the approved projects for exceeding the program's 100 Mbps symmetrical requirements and for focusing on connecting low-income and disadvantaged communities. A top state legislator recently criticized the CPUC for not rolling out last-mile grants faster (see 2406050065). Thursday’s resolutions awarding federal funding account support are the CPUC's first since the agency received 484 applications requesting $4.6 billion from the $2 billion program in January, Executive Director Rachel Peterson said. The commission plans a vote at its Aug. 1 meeting on another resolution that would include $95 million in proposed grants (see 2407010037). Before the meeting, the commission delayed until Aug. 1 voting on a proposed decision related to ratemaking for small local exchange carriers (see 2406070027).
States hope they can increase federal engagement on telecom no matter who is president in 2025, current and former state utility commissioners said in interviews. In a possible second Donald Trump presidency, “the states and localities are really going to be where broadband policy is made,” predicted Gigi Sohn, Benton Institute for Broadband & Society senior fellow. Some said there is a lot of uncertainty about how a Trump administration might change rules for state grants under NTIA’s $42.5 billion broadband equity, access and deployment (BEAD) program.
Communications Daily is tracking the lawsuits below involving appeals of FCC actions.
The California Privacy Protection Agency sought feedback on proposed data broker registration rules, the CPPA said Friday. Comments are due Aug. 20. The CPPA will also hold a virtual hearing that day at 1 p.m. PDT. California’s 2023 Delete Act authorized the agency to make registration rules. “The proposed regulations address common questions and obstacles that surfaced for data brokers in the initial registration period,” including about registration fees, statutory definitions and requirements for registration, registry updates and website disclosures, the CPPA said.
Maine and Vermont legislators will reintroduce comprehensive privacy bills next session, lead sponsors told us in interviews. Republican Gov. Phil Scott’s veto of Vermont’s privacy bill hasn’t discouraged supporters from seeking a private right of action (PRA) that Scott and industry opposed, Rep. Monique Priestley (D), the comprehensive measure’s sponsor, said. Meanwhile, in Maine, a veto threat from Gov. Janet Mills (D) means neither party will pursue a PRA in the upcoming session, Sen. Lisa Keim (R) told us. Mills' opposition to a PRA made it a nonstarter this session.
A California bill on digital discrimination will advance to the Senate Appropriations Committee after clearing two policy committees Tuesday. Sponsor Assemblymember Mia Bonta (D) vigorously defended the bill including a disparate impact standard at the Communications Committee hearing that day (see 2407020062). AB-2239 would ban digital discrimination as the FCC defines it. “This is a win for disconnected Californians,” Bonta said in an emailed news release Wednesday. “Low-income communities and communities of color are disproportionately disconnected.” The California legislature returns from summer recess Aug. 5.
California video franchising is working fine as is, the California Video & Broadband Association (CalBroadband) said Monday. The state cable group urged the California Public Utilities Commission to “continue with the existing approach and adhere closely to the legislative mandates set forth in” a 2021 law that increased CPUC authority under the state’s Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act (DIVCA) to check if state video franchisees are deploying enough broadband. “Since the passage of DIVCA, an industry landscape of primarily locally franchised traditional cable providers has been replaced with a highly competitive, diversified environment that now includes a plethora of non-traditional video service providers,” CalBroadband said.
California’s Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday passed legislation that would set stricter limits on sharing children’s personal data. The committee unanimously approved the California Children’s Data Privacy Act (AB-1949). Assemblymember Buffy Wicks (D) introduced the bill that would ban websites and platforms from collecting and sharing personal data of users younger than 18 without their informed consent. For users younger than 13, companies would need to obtain parental consent. AB-1949 would amend the California Consumer Privacy Act. The Computer & Communications Industry Association, TechNet and CalChamber voiced opposition to the bill Tuesday. Common Sense Media and California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) support the measure. Wicks noted that Bonta’s office investigated Meta and alleged the company knows children younger than 13 access its platforms and that their data is collected in violation of federal law. Bonta’s probe showed about 30% of residents between ages 10 and 12 access Meta platforms. On Tuesday, Bonta's office called AB-1949 a “simple, graceful” solution strengthening children’s privacy protections. In addition, the committee passed AB-2839, a deepfake-related measure that would prohibit people and companies from sharing election campaign content when it contains “materially deceptive and digitally altered or digitally created images or audio or video files” with the intent of influencing elections. Entertainment companies voiced opposition to the legislation Tuesday. Moreover, the Motion Picture Association said it wants sponsors to exempt streaming services from the bill. Warner Bros. Discovery, Sony and NBCUniversal said they are aligned with MPA in opposition. Assemblymember Gail Pellerin (D), the bill's author, said getting accurate information to state voters is “crucial to a functioning democracy.”
California state senators pushed back on two digital equity bills Tuesday. Multiple Communications Committee members during a livestreamed hearing raised concerns about the Assembly-passed AB-2239, which would ban digital discrimination as the FCC defines it. Also, the committee scaled back the Assembly-approved AB-1588, which had proposed to update the California LifeLine subsidy program to support broadband for low-income households. The committee directed the LifeLine bill’s sponsor to find a compromise with industry opponents and other stakeholders over the summer recess that runs from July 3 to Aug. 5.
North Carolina will award $61 million in broadband grants through the American Rescue Plan Act, the state broadband office said Monday. AT&T, Brightspeed and Charter Communications won many of the awards. In California, the Public Utilities Commission said Friday that the agency will vote Aug. 1 on a proposed resolution (T-17833) to approve about $95 million in last-mile grants through its federal funding program. The CPUC estimated that 71% of the locations that would receive service are in low-income areas, while 76% are in disadvantaged areas. The California awardees would include Comcast ($26.6 million), AT&T ($12 million), Frontier Communications ($2 million), the Golden State Connect Authority ($7 million) and the Fort Bidwell Indian community ($23.9 million).