Industry urged the FCC to give providers more time to honor requests from consumers to revoke prior express consent through any reasonable means under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, in reply comments posted Tuesday in docket 02-278 (see 2308010071). Some commenters sought clarity on what would constitute "reasonable means" for a consumer to make an opt-out request.
More than 20 million households have enrolled in the FCC's affordable connectivity program to date, said a news release Monday. The commission said it has hosted or participated in more than 1,400 virtual and in-person awareness and enrollment efforts. “Enrolling more than 20 million eligible households is no small feat -- and wouldn’t be possible without the partnership of organizations in rural, suburban, and urban communities across the country who are getting the word about this powerful program," said Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel: "We’ve made too much progress in helping families get online to turn back now."
Providers participating in the FCC's affordable connectivity program must submit information required for the commission's data collection by Nov. 9, said a Wireline Bureau public notice Friday in docket 21-450. OMB completed its review of the proposed data collection Friday. Providers can begin submitting data Sept. 8.
DENVER -- The state with the biggest allocation from NTIA’s broadband, equity, access and deployment (BEAD) will probably need more money to connect everyone, a Texas broadband official said on a Wednesday panel at Mountain Connect here. Other states also said they don’t have enough money to connect everyone, though some said alternative technologies like fixed wireless could be used.
Consumer advocates, industry and local officials want more details in the five-year action plan California will submit to NTIA as part of the broadband, equity, access and deployment program Many in comments posted Tuesday in docket R-23-02-016 (see 2307180013) sought additional information in the final plan about affordability and digital equity efforts.
DENVER -- Sen. John Hickenlooper sees no hurdles to broadband, equity, access and deployment (BEAD) program success, the Colorado Democrat said Tuesday. At the Mountain Connect conference, Hickenlooper, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) and multiple states' broadband officials largely sounded upbeat on achieving universal access within a decade. Also, Hickenlooper expects “tremendous pressure” to reup the affordable connectivity program (ACP), but said debt concerns might limit how much funding it receives from Congress.
FCC commissioners approved a notice of inquiry on the use of AI and other technologies in managing how spectrum is used and an order providing an up-to-$75 monthly broadband benefit, through the affordable connectivity program, for subscribers living in qualifying high-cost areas, both 4-0 Thursday.
Consumer advocates and industry disagreed on whether it's necessary to codify FCC rules to ensure callers may revoke prior express consent through any reasonable means under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, in comments posted Tuesday in docket 02-278. Some carriers warned it could inhibit certain important information being provided to consumers. Commissioners adopted the item in June (see 2306080043).
The California Public Utilities Commission may vote Aug. 31 on a proposal to deny a California Broadband and Video Association petition to modify a resolution on public housing, the CPUC said Friday. The state cable association raised concerns in March with a December CPUC resolution awarding $1.4 million in California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) broadband public housing account (BPHA) grants to 19 projects. While not seeking to overturn the award, CalBroadband asked the CPUC to remove language saying broadband services that are free due to ACP or other subsidies don't count as free services for purposes of determining if an application is eligible for funding (See 2303220053). The CPUC’s proposed resolution T-17796 would deny the CalBroadband petition since it “raises no new or changed facts,” and the commission addressed its issues in previous decisions, the CPUC said. “To the extent CalBroadband raises a new policy argument, a petition for modification is not the proper vehicle to raise it,” it said. “The Commission has consistently held that a petition for modification is not a second bite at the apple: it will not consider issues which are simply re-litigation of issues that it has already considered.” Consumer advocates urged CPUC denial. CalBroadband didn’t comment Monday.
House Commerce Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., and Senate Commerce Committee ranking member Ted Cruz, R-Texas, declared their “strong opposition” Monday to FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel’s “Learning Without Limits” proposal to allow E-rate program money to pay for Wi-Fi on school buses and for hot spots (see 2306260029). The GOP leaders urged Rosenworcel and the other three FCC commissioners to “get E-rate’s house in order before seeking new ways to spend consumers’ hard-earned money,” citing “deep-seated problems” with the program they believe is “full of waste, fraud, and abuse.” Cruz asked the GAO in May to investigate the FCC's administration of USF programs (see 2305110066). “Not only does” Rosenworcel’s proposal “violate federal law, but it would also duplicate programs across the federal government, directly contradicting FCC commissioners’ repeated commitments to streamlining federal broadband funding,” Cruz and Rodgers said in letters to the FCC chairwoman and Commissioners Brendan Carr, Nathan Simington and Geoffrey Starks. The lawmakers argued Communications Act Section 254 confines the FCC’s E-rate authority “to classrooms and libraries” and doesn’t extend to “off-campus use of eligible” services. “Expanding E-Rate to fund equipment like Wi-Fi hotspots would break with the statute and longstanding precedent” that USF “dollars, which fund the E-Rate program, may only be used to fund services and not consumer devices,” Cruz and Rodgers said. Attempting to transform E-rate “into a consumer broadband subsidy program” means the FCC “would duplicate other taxpayer-funded programs,” including the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act-mandated $14.2 billion affordable connectivity program. E-rate “is not directly funded by Congress and lacks congressionally mandated safeguards,” the Republicans said: There’s also “no telling how much USF fees could increase to pay for” such a “dramatic” expansion of E-rate. They asked all four commissioners to respond by Aug. 14. The FCC didn’t comment.