An age-appropriate social media design bill that Pennsylvania lawmakers are considering is unenforceable because of its vague language about protecting children, House Children and Youth ranking member Barry Jozwiak (R) said Wednesday. The committee planned to vote on the Online Safety Protection Act (HB-1879) but postponed the motion over Jozwiak's technical objections. Introduced by Chair Donna Bullock (D), HB-1879 would require companies that design platforms a child will “likely" access do so with the “best interest” of children in mind. In addition, it would require age-appropriate design standards similar to provisions included in California’s enjoined social media design law (see 2311160059). Committee staff said Google supports the legislation in Pennsylvania. Google didn’t comment Wednesday. Jozwiak said he has received three pages of questions and concerns from Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry (D) about the bill’s “overly broad” terms and definitions. The measure is “essentially unenforceable” against entities that don’t gather “actual knowledge” of ages, and the AG lacks the resources to enforce it as written, he said. He formally filed to have the legislation tabled. That motion failed on a 14-11 party-line vote. Committee members had several weeks to file amendments and work with sponsors, Bullock said. Joziak argued consideration of the legislation would be out of order because a Bullock amendment was received at 1:22 p.m. Tuesday, and committee rules dictate that the deadline is 1 p.m. Bullock conferred with committee staff and ultimately tabled the bill. Her amendment would alter some language, including terms like “best interests of a child.” The amendment would extend the effective date of the legislation to December 2025.

Banning social media platforms from using algorithms to tailor content could expose children to harmful content, the Computer & Communications Industry Association said Wednesday. CCIA wrote a letter of opposition against a bill the New York State Legislature is considering. Introduced by Sen. Andrew Gounardes (D) and sponsored by Sen. Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick (R), the Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act (S-7694A) would ban platforms from using algorithms that provide “addictive feeds” to minors. California is also looking into regulations for kids’ algorithms (see 2405210019). “These algorithms also protect teens from harmful content and help tailor online content for younger users,” CCIA said. “While the intent is to reduce the potential for excessive scrolling, eliminating algorithms could lead to a random assortment of content being delivered to users, potentially exposing them to inappropriate material.” Northeast Regional Policy Manager Alex Spyropoulos said there are “numerous tools” that prevent excessive screen time and content consumption without compromising protective measures. The New York bill’s age-verification provisions could also “increase the amount of sensitive information users must share with companies and potentially cut off users from the online communities they depend on,” CCIA said.

Cash-strapped California has many challenges ahead as it seeks to connect everyone to broadband, said state, local and industry officials Wednesday at the livestreamed California Broadband Summit. Assembly Communications Committee Chair Tasha Boerner (D) said she has several concerns with state broadband policy, including that the California Public Utilities Commission is taking too long to distribute last-mile grants.

The California Public Utilities Commission should freeze California LifeLine specific support amounts (SSA) until state regulators and stakeholders can find a better way of calculating them, a consumer group and low-income wireless service providers said in comments Monday. The CPUC is considering freezing the SSA at $19 for wireline and wireless providers (see 2405070050). Meanwhile, consumer advocates defended their petition for temporary bridge funding through LifeLine that would help cover the loss of federal affordable connectivity program (ACP) support.

Weighing changes to state video franchise rules, the California Public Utilities Commission scheduled four hearings on updating the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act (DIVCA) requirements. A 2021 state law required the DIVCA rulemaking (see 2306050051). A pair of in-person hearings is scheduled for Aug. 14 in Sacramento; two more will occur Sept. 5 in Monterey Park, California, the agency said Friday. Also, the CPUC will hold two virtual hearings Sept. 19, it said.

AT&T raised legal and constitutional concerns as it protested a California Public Utilities Commission proposed decision that denies it relief of carrier of last resort (COLR) obligations. But in other comments the agency received Thursday, some local representatives strongly supported the plan to dismiss AT&T’s application. “Upholding this decision is vital to ensure residents across California … continue to have access to basic telephone service,” said San Mateo County in docket R.23-03-003.

California is considering some “awful” regulations for AI, tech entrepreneur Andrew Ng said Thursday. His comments came a day after California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) warned state lawmakers against overregulating AI.

T-Mobile’s proposed acquisition of UScellular’s wireless operations, including about 30% of its spectrum, has already seen opposition (see 2405280047), with more expected. In addition, the deal will likely face heavy scrutiny from DOJ and the FCC, industry experts agree. Handicapping whether the transaction will receive approval is difficult, especially headed into a presidential election in November, industry officials say. Some of the 21 states where UScellular has a presence could play at least limited roles reviewing the deal, state and other officials said. T-Mobile’s buy of Mint and other assets from Ka’ena, a smaller deal that didn’t involve spectrum, took regulators more than a year to approve.

Colorado will be the fifth state with a right-to-repair law covering consumer electronics. Gov. Jared Polis (D) signed HB-1121 on Tuesday. Consumer Reports applauded. “In this legislative season we have seen Oregon and Colorado pass comprehensive right to repair laws that also cover parts pairing, and we hope to see further legislative action to prevent software from becoming a tool to enforce manufacturers’ monopolies on the repair process,” said CR Tech Policy Director Justin Brookman. Parts pairing is a manufacturer practice of using software to identify component parts through a unique identifier. Oregon made a similar law in March (see 2403270066. California, New York and Minnesota enacted digital right-to-repair laws previously. Also, Polis signed HB-1234 to indefinitely extend the state's high-cost support mechanism, which provides subsidies to a dozen rural telecom providers and is scheduled to sunset Sept. 1. The legislature passed the bill last month (see 2404220051).

The California Public Utilities Commission again postponed an AT&T enforcement item that had first appeared on the CPUC’s Feb. 15 meeting agenda and was scheduled for Thursday's meeting. Staff held the repeatedly revised item (resolution T-17789) until June 20, said a Tuesday hold list released in advance of Thursday’s meeting. The proposal would deny AT&T’s plan for correcting failures and improving service after failing to meet the state’s out-of-service repair interval standard in 2021. The CPUC didn’t comment Wednesday on the reason for the continuing delays.