Communications Daily is tracking the lawsuits below involving appeals of FCC actions. Lawsuits added since the last update are in bold.

CTIA presented a 109-page argument against California regulating wireless service quality. Comments were posted through Tuesday at the California Public Utilities Commission. The commission is weighing a staff proposal that moves away from the CPUC’s light-touch approach to wireless and interconnected VoIP. While industry widely panned the plan and hinted at lawsuits, public advocates said expanding regulation of newer voice services is a must.

California state legislators approved privacy and social media bills before adjourning Saturday. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) will now consider signing the measures into law. On privacy, the Assembly voted 55-15 Saturday to concur with Senate amendments to AB-1008, which would clarify that personal information under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) can exist in different formats, including physical and digital. Meanwhile, the Senate voted 38-0 to concur with Senate changes to SB-1223, which would amend the CCPA to include “neural data” as a type of sensitive personal information. However, a bill on automated decision-making (AB-2930) stalled in the Senate. The legislature passed several bills about social media. The Assembly voted 58-0 to concur with Senate amendments to AB-2481, which would create a mechanism for people who report threatening content on social networks. The Senate voted 28-2 to finally pass SB-976, which would provide parental controls, including the ability to decide whether their children see a chronological news feed or one based on an algorithm, the current default. Senators unanimously concurred with the Assembly to pass SB-1283, which would require schools to adopt limits or bans on student use of smartphones in an effort to keep kids off social platforms when on campus. The legislature previously passed a similar Assembly (see 2408280033). And the Senate voted 36-0 to send the governor SB-1504, which would tighten a cyberbullying law that requires social platforms to have reporting mechanisms. However, the legislature failed to bring to a final vote AB-3172, which would have established civil penalties for a big social media platform that “breaches its responsibility of ordinary care and skill to a child” younger than 18. Lawmakers approved many other telecom and internet bills last week (see 2408300039).

California lawmakers supported stopping kids from accessing social media through smartphones at school before the 2024 legislative session wrapped up last week. On Friday, the Assembly voted 51-0 for SB-1283, which would require that schools to adopt limits or bans on student use of smartphones. The legislature passed a similar bill (AB-3216) earlier last week (see 2408280033). Amendments to SB-1283 ensure the bill won’t expand surveillance of children but simply keeps them off social media at school, said Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D) on the floor. Also Friday, the legislature passed a bill to require social media platforms to have a staffed hotline for responding to law enforcement information requests, and to comply within 72 hours to search warrants. No senator opposed concurring with Assembly changes to SB-918. Voting continued after our deadline. On Thursday, state lawmakers passed video franchise and privacy bills. The Assembly voted 50-16 Thursday to concur with Senate changes to AB-1826 to update the state’s 2006 video franchise law, the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act. If signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), the bill will increase DIVCA fines for service-quality problems and seeks increased participation from the public and its advocates in the franchise renewal process. The Assembly also concurred with the Senate on AB-1949, which would set stricter limits on sharing children’s personal data under the California Consumer Privacy Act. Also on Thursday, the Assembly voted 71-0 to pass SB-1504, which would tighten a cyberbullying law that requires social platforms to have reporting mechanisms. It still needed another vote in the Senate. The same day, the Senate voted 30-2 to pass AB-2481, which would create a mechanism for people who report threatening content on social media platforms. That bill still needed another vote in the Assembly. The legislature earlier passed bills on AI, privacy, social media and network resiliency (see 2408290005 and 2408280033).

California broke ground on a 256-mile route in its middle-mile network, the office of Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said Thursday. The open-access fiber route will reach from San Jose to Carson City, Nevada, crossing through the Sierra Nevada Mountains, the governor’s office said. The state is currently constructing 1,666 miles of a planned 8,000-mile network, it said. In the next three months, it plans to start construction on 33 segments comprising 1,590 miles. California Government Operations Secretary Amy Tong said, “Together with urban, rural, and tribal communities across California, we’re ensuring a robust fiber infrastructure network that connects and unites our state.”

The California legislature will send state bills on smartphones in schools, privacy and social media to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). On Wednesday, the Assembly concurred with Senate changes to AB-3216, which would require schools adopt limits or bans on student use of smartphones; AB-3048, which would require web browsers to opt-out from the sale of and sharing data on all websites; AB-1824, which would require a business acquiring another company to follow an acquired customer’s privacy directions under the California Consumer Privacy Act; and AB-1282, which orders a study on mental health risks of social media for children. The Senate approved the bills Tuesday (see 2408280033). In addition, the Assembly voted 48-16 for a measure (SB-1047) allowing the attorney general to pursue civil penalties against large AI developers if they cause “severe harm” to residents. On Thursday, the Senate voted 29-9 to concur with the Assembly and send the AI bill to the governor. SpaceX and Tesla founder Elon Musk said California should “probably pass” the bill that Sen. Scott Wiener (D) proposed (see 2408270047). Meanwhile on Wednesday, the Senate voted 25-10 to pass AB-1826, which would update California's 2006 video franchise law, known as the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act (DIVCA). The bill would increase fines for service-quality problems and seeks increased participation from the public and its advocates in the franchise renewal process. And senators voted 33-0 to pass AB-1949, which would set stricter limits on sharing children’s personal data under the CCPA. The Senate-passed bills will go back to the Assembly to concur with Senate amendments. On Thursday, California Privacy Protection Agency Executive Director Ashkan Soltani applauded passage of the bill requiring opt-out preference signals, which, he said, will make it "significantly easier for Californians to exercise their opt–out rights online." The Computer & Communications Industry Association opposed the AI bill in a statement Thursday. The measure's goals "appear well-intentioned, but poorly informed and ill-executed," said CCIA State Policy Director Khara Boender. "It would disrupt the development of the U.S. AI ecosystem by imposing untenable liability as U.S. companies compete with foreign companies."

Google maintains a search market monopoly by self-preferencing products to the detriment of smaller competitors who offer superior local search results, Yelp said in an antitrust lawsuit filed against Google on Wednesday. Yelp filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It claims Google has engaged in “numerous” anticompetitive practices, including stealing search data from Yelp, self-preferencing its own results and using algorithms to steer online traffic away from Yelp. In addition, the lawsuit claims that when Google tried to buy Yelp in 2009, it recognized the quality of Yelp results. When Yelp “rebuffed Google, Google began a years-long mission to stymie Yelp’s ability to reach consumers through Google’s dominant general search platform.” Google, in a statement said, Yelp’s claims are “meritless” and “not new.” Similar claims were “thrown out years ago by the FTC, and recently by the judge in the DOJ’s case,” Google said, referring to Judge Amit Mehta’s recent decision (see 2408050052). “On the other aspects of the decision to which Yelp refers, we are appealing. Google will vigorously defend against Yelp’s meritless claims.” Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman on Wednesday claimed Google “manipulates its results to promote its own local search offerings above those of its rivals, regardless of the comparative poorer quality of its own properties, exempting itself from the qualitative ranking system it uses for other sites.”

Telecom and broadband regulatory lawyer Kristopher Twomey was suspended from practicing in the District of Columbia for two years, the D.C. Court of Appeals ordered Thursday. Accepting the recommendation of its Board of Professional Responsibility, the court said Twomey gave two clients false assurances about the status of their eligible telecommunication carrier applications. In addition, Twomey, the board said, created a false docket number for a California application so he could cover up that he had not filed it in a timely manner. That caused another lawyer working on the application to repeat a false statement to the FCC, it said. The board said Twomey also told a client to repeat false claims to the FCC that the Tennessee authority had declined jurisdiction by returning an application. In fact, Twomey never filed it, according to the board. Twomey, the board noted, should have kept his clients better informed about significant deadlines that might not be met. It said he received an interim suspension on July 17. Deciding were Judges Corinne Beckwith, Roy McLeese and Vanessa Ruiz. Twomey -- seemingly the sole practitioner of his California firm, with no other lawyers listed on its website -- didn't comment.

California state senators passed bills on telecom, privacy and social media Wednesday. The state Senate voted 38-0 for AB-2765, which would require that the California Public Utilities Commission report on inspections that ensure companies comply with resiliency plans. The Assembly then concurred with Senate changes, allowing the bill to go to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). Also, the Senate voted 38-1 to approve a bill (AB-3216) requiring that schools adopt limits or bans on student use of smartphones. On privacy, the Senate voted 31-7 for AB-3048, which would require web browsers to opt-out from the sale of and sharing data on all websites. Senators voted 39-0 for AB-1824, which would require a business acquiring another company to follow an acquired customer’s privacy directions under the California Consumer Privacy Act. In addition, they voted 40-0 for a bill (AB-1282) that would require a study on mental health risks of social media for children. The Assembly previously passed AB-1282, AB-1824, AB-3216 and AB-3048 but must vote again to concur with Senate changes. Also Tuesday, Newsom received AB-2905, which the legislature passed last week. It would expand the state’s autodialer definition to include calls made with an AI voice. The California legislature wraps up its session Saturday.

Communications Daily is tracking the lawsuits below involving appeals of FCC actions.