NTCA said many rural carriers can't estimate their company-specific impact of the FCC’s “potential bifurcated approach” to updating rate-of-return USF mechanisms for broadband coverage. Reform details remain unsettled, the RLEC group said, and “average schedule” carriers have access only to “industrywide aggregate ‘price-outs’ that” are unlikely to reflect their particular results, and to their own spreadsheets consisting of “hundreds, if not thousands, of inputs,” which also remain works in progress. “We encouraged the Commission to remain open to simpler, more straightforward ways of achieving the same goals of reform via 'modules' (e.g., new limits or policy changes) that could be applied to any distributional mechanism rather than creating substantial new complexity by remaking the underlying distribution calculations,” NTCA said in a filing on an FCC meeting it had that was posted Monday in docket 10-90. It backed “sensible transitions” to how the costs of prior investments would be treated -- such as operating expense limits -- under an overhaul, including the proposed bifurcated approach, which would generally treat old investments under old rules and new investments under new rules. It's unclear how new limits or caps on prior investments, most of all sunk costs, would be consistent with the bifurcated approach, the group said, but if they're instituted, carriers would need time to adjust.
Capitol Hill fell short of achieving many of the telecom goals lawmakers touted at 2015’s start. One session into the current GOP-controlled Congress, the scorecard disheartens some industry lobbyists and observers, but not all told us they saw reason for disappointment. Some emphasized what they judged key developments in spectrum and broadband deployment negotiation. Lawmakers said they hoped for 2016 progress on these issues despite likely presidential election distractions.
Capitol Hill fell short of achieving many of the telecom goals lawmakers touted at 2015’s start. One session into the current GOP-controlled Congress, the scorecard disheartens some industry lobbyists and observers, but not all told us they saw reason for disappointment. Some emphasized what they judged key developments in spectrum and broadband deployment negotiation. Lawmakers said they hoped for 2016 progress on these issues despite likely presidential election distractions.
The FCC is looking to overhaul rate-of-return USF systems fairly early in 2016, rural telco representatives told us. To support and spur broadband deployment, the commission is pursuing a two-track plan that would both modernize legacy subsidy flows and give rural carriers an optional new mechanism based on a cost model, they said Wednesday. The FCC’s “message to industry is ‘let’s keep working and see where we get to,’” said Lynn Follansbee, USTelecom vice president-law and policy. “I have no doubt that we will get to an order sometime early next year.”
The FCC is looking to overhaul rate-of-return USF systems fairly early in 2016, rural telco representatives told us. To support and spur broadband deployment, the commission is pursuing a two-track plan that would both modernize legacy subsidy flows and give rural carriers an optional new mechanism based on a cost model, they said Wednesday. The FCC’s “message to industry is ‘let’s keep working and see where we get to,’” said Lynn Follansbee, USTelecom vice president-law and policy. “I have no doubt that we will get to an order sometime early next year.”
The FCC gave incumbent telcos relief from “obsolete” phone regulations while preserving others it said are needed to protect consumers and competition. The commission approved an order at Thursday’s meeting granting several USTelecom requests that the agency forbear from requiring ILECs to meet certain requirements on wholesale network access (including to some conduits), stand-alone residential long-distance service, and “enhanced services.” But it denied ILECs relief from duties to provide voice service in certain rural areas, safeguards for “enterprise” stand-alone long-distance service, and a prohibition against “contract tariffs” for business data services in some areas.
TracFone resisted AT&T Lifeline proposals for the FCC to overhaul the USF support program for low-income consumers. TracFone opposed AT&T suggestions that carriers be removed from all Lifeline enrollment functions and that eligibility be initially tied solely to the federal food stamps program, which TracFone said would have a “devastating impact on Lifeline availability.” The comments came in a response posted Tuesday to a Nov. 23 AT&T filing flowing from an NPRM (see 1506180029). Other parties filing recently in docket 11-42 included the Cherokee Nation, Incompas, Lifeline Connects Coalition and Smith Bagley, with many comments addressing proposed minimum service standards for Lifeline broadband/voice coverage.
TracFone resisted AT&T Lifeline proposals for the FCC to overhaul the USF support program for low-income consumers. TracFone opposed AT&T suggestions that carriers be removed from all Lifeline enrollment functions and that eligibility be initially tied solely to the federal food stamps program, which TracFone said would have a “devastating impact on Lifeline availability.” The comments came in a response posted Tuesday to a Nov. 23 AT&T filing flowing from an NPRM (see 1506180029). Other parties filing recently in docket 11-42 included the Cherokee Nation, Incompas, Lifeline Connects Coalition and Smith Bagley, with many comments addressing proposed minimum service standards for Lifeline broadband/voice coverage.
The regulatory fee battle raged as the American Cable Association and ITTA urged the FCC to shift some fees from wireline to wireless companies, while CTIA opposed that. CTIA also opposed NAB’s proposal to reapportion regulatory fees to the wireless sector because of the planned incentive auction, which will allow wireless providers to bid for broadcast TV spectrum. ACA and CTIA filed reply comments (here and here), while ITTA made an ex parte filing this week in docket 15-121 on a recent meeting with FCC officials. NAB met with officials last week to discuss its proposal (see 1512030061).
The American Cable Association asked the FCC to revise financial qualifications a draft order would require of applicants seeking to participate in its planned reverse auction for broadband-oriented Connect America Fund Phase II subsidy support. The qualifications under consideration “are so onerous that they would act as a disincentive” to small-provider participation in the auction, said ACA in a Wednesday filing in docket 10-90 on a meeting with agency officials. Instead, the FCC should “tailor the requirements so that 'serious' smaller providers could participate,” said ACA, which represents small cable and telco video providers. To allow experienced small applicants to participate while ensuring they're financially qualified, ACA suggested smaller providers shouldn't be required to submit audited financial information before bidding. It said such information can cost $50,000-$100,000 -- “a large amount for a smaller bidder with no certainty of prevailing” in the auction, under which low subsidy bidders would generally win support. If the FCC remains concerned about small applicants' wherewithal, it could require them to put “a reasonable amount of money in escrow” that could be forfeited if they didn't comply with post-auction requirements, ACA said. And it said smaller participants should be allowed “to obtain a Letter of Credit ('LOC') other than from a 'top 100 bank' that has a Triple B or better credit rating and that is insured by the FDIC [Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation] or FCSIC [Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation].” That requirement might work for larger providers, ACA said, “but most of ACA's smaller providers only have relationships with community -- not top 100 -- banks." This "is not only driven by longstanding relationships within a community; it also has a sound financial basis” because “big banks find it inefficient and unprofitable to make small loans (or loan commitments)” and “smaller providers in turn are loathe to pay the high fees big banks demand,” the group said. ACA said it plans to offer specific alternative financial qualification proposals.