The FCC should “assume a less interventionist regulatory posture by narrowing the exercise of its public interest authority,” said Free State Foundation President Randolph May in a blog post Thursday. He said a narrower definition of “public interest” should apply in merger reviews and administration of the USF. The FCC “should reform the merger review process by announcing a policy that, absent extraordinary circumstances, it will largely defer to the DOJ’s and FTC’s expertise regarding any competitive concerns.” He called for the agency to “refrain from imposing ‘voluntary' conditions on merger proponents that are unrelated to compliance with existing statutory or regulatory requirements.” Narrower definitions are also needed when the FCC periodically reviews regulations to determine if they are still in the public interest, May said. The FCC “should assert that it possesses the discretion to narrow the scope of its public interest determination in the regulatory review proceedings to effectuate their obvious deregulatory intent." When deciding whether to forebear from enforcing unnecessary rules, the FCC should consider itself to have satisfied the public interest if the rule in question isn’t needed to ensure provider practices are just or protect consumers, May said. “Then, the forbearance provision could be used, as Congress intended, to eliminate many of the legacy regulations which remain on the Commission's books.”
The FCC and FTC should improve the audience measurement of Spanish-language broadcasters, a host of such broadcasters told FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez and FTC Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya at a roundtable Wednesday at Florida International University. Gomez and Bedoya said they would seek to “continue the conversation” and hold further roundtables on the issue. “This sounds like something industry needs to sit and figure out,” Gomez said. Asked about the chances of the FTC intervening, Bedoya said it would be important to show his Republican colleagues that the matter involves market failure and is not related to diversity, equity and inclusion. “I’m going to be very blunt: That brand -- DEI -- is not in favor right now. This is not about that.” Nielsen uses overly small sample sizes to determine audiences for Spanish-language broadcasters, leading to inaccurate measurements and fluctuating ratings, the broadcasters said. Nielsen didn’t immediately comment and didn’t attend the panel, though Bedoya said the company was invited. Two households leaving a ratings panel can cause a station’s ratings to be cut in half, said Entravision Chief Governmental Affairs Officer Marcelo Gaete. “Six thousand Latinos are deciding the fate of 50 million,” said Stephanie Valencia, owner of the Latino Media Network. The broadcasters mentioned Nielsen’s lack of competition as the reason the company hasn't improved how it handles Spanish-language broadcasting. “They need to have skin in the game,” Gaete said. Nielsen is “an unregulated monopoly,” said Raul Alarcon, CEO of Spanish Broadcasting System.
President Donald Trump’s latest norm-busting executive order (see 2502180069) directing the FCC, among other "so-called independent" agencies and executive branch bodies, to submit regulatory actions to the White House before they're published in the Federal Register could complicate Brendan Carr’s push to be an active chairman at the FCC, industry experts said Wednesday.
NextNav appoints Renee Gregory, ex-Google, as vice president-regulatory affairs ... FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson adds David Shaw, formerly Morrison & Foerster, as principal deputy director, and Kelse Moen, ex-Senate Judiciary Committee, as deputy director, Bureau of Competition; promotes Douglas Geho to deputy director, Bureau of Consumer Protection … Wiley names Ian Barlow, ex-FTC, as of counsel.
An emergency petition Sunday by the executive branch seeking U.S. Supreme Court intervention to block courts from interfering with the removal of the head of the Office of Special Counsel could have implications for the president’s removal power over FCC commissioners, said Free State Foundation President Randolph May in a blog post Tuesday. Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris asked SCOTUS to vacate a temporary restraining order barring the removal of Office of Special Counsel leader Hampton Dellinger as “an unprecedented assault on the separation of powers.” Blocking the president from removing presidential appointees under his authority “inflicts the gravest of injuries on the Executive Branch and the separation of powers,” said the emergency petition. In it, Harris restated DOJ's argument (see 2502140047) that tenure protections for members of multimember commissions are unconstitutional. “If this view ultimately prevails in the Supreme Court, a president's authority to remove an FCC commissioner without providing any reason would be assured,” May said. The court could instead rule that Dellinger could be ousted based on language in the statute that allows the head of the Office of Special Counsel to be removed for inefficiency, malfeasance or neglect of duty, he added. Other agencies targeted in a recent letter to Congress from the Solicitor General -- such as the FTC and the National Labor Relations Board -- are based on statutes with similar language, but that language isn’t present in the Communications Act. That could be “determinative” if a president ever tries to remove an FCC commissioner, May said. He included a disclaimer at the end of his post clarifying that he isn't advocating for White House removal of FCC commissioners.
FTC political appointees are prohibited from holding leadership roles in the American Bar Association, participating in ABA events or renewing ABA memberships, FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson announced Feb. 14.
The U.S. solicitor general’s announcement that DOJ plans to stop defending removal protections for multimember commissions at independent agencies could include the FCC even though the agency wasn’t mentioned in the letter, Free State Foundation President Randolph May wrote in a blog post Friday. In the letter (see 2502130063), acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris said DOJ will ask the Supreme Court to overturn the 1935 ruling in Humphrey's Executor v. FTC that protects independent commissioners from presidential removal. May wrote that the FCC’s structure is “very much like” the agencies named in the letter -- the FTC, National Labor Relations Board and Consumer Product Safety Commission. “If the SG's view of the president's removal power regarding the three identified agencies is correct, it may be difficult to distinguish the FCC,” he said. However, unlike those agencies, the FCC’s governing statute -- the Communications Act -- doesn’t contain a “for-cause” limitation on presidential removal of commissioners, May wrote. The SG’s letter relied heavily on SCOTUS' 2019 Seila Law v. CFPB decision, in which the high court ruled that limiting the ability of the president to remove commissioners only for cause was unconstitutional. The Communications Act’s lack of “for-cause” restrictions “could possibly make all the difference” on whether a future SCOTUS ruling on Humphrey’s Executor allows for easier White House removal of commissioners, May said.
Acting U.S. Solicitor General Sarah Harris told Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Dick Durbin, D-Ill., on Wednesday that DOJ plans to stop defending tenure protections that bar a president from firing a commissioner from an independent agency at will, including FTC commissioners. Harris said she plans to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn that precedent, established in its 1935 Humphrey’s Executor v. U.S. ruling, a shift that would also affect the FCC. DOJ “has determined that certain for-cause removal provisions that apply to members of multi-member regulatory commissions are unconstitutional,” Harris said in a letter to Durbin. The high court has held that Humphrey’s Executor “applies only to administrative bodies that do not exercise ‘substantial executive power’” and has explained it “misapprehended the powers of the ‘New Deal-era FTC’ and misclassified those powers as primarily legislative and judicial.” She said the precedent “thus does not fit the principal officers who head” the FTC and two other agencies: the National Labor Relations Board and Consumer Product Safety Commission. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other conservative groups asked SCOTUS in July to overturn Humphrey’s Executor in Consumers' Research et al. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission (see 2407290027).
Wiley adds Ian Barlow, formerly FTC, as of counsel … DCI Group taps Dishan De Silva, ex-Silver Square, as CFO, new post … Thrive appoints Ben Reich, ex-Opti9 Tech, CFO … Lantronix names Steve Burrington, ex-Ikotek USA, as vice president-global research and development, replacing Eric Bass ... Spectrum Reach promotes Jason Brown to executive vice president, replacing David Kline, president and Charter executive vice president, retiring, effective in May, after 46 years.
Comcast confirmed Tuesday that FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has asked the Enforcement Bureau to launch a probe of its and subsidiary NBCUniversal’s diversity, equity and inclusion programs to determine if they violate equal employment opportunity laws. The move is Carr’s latest foray against U.S. broadcasters, including probes of CBS, NPR and PBS (see 2502050063 and 2501300065), since he became FCC chairman Jan. 20. Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., railed against the FCC and other federal agencies Tuesday for collectively “waging a relentless war on online speech and independent journalism” in the weeks since President Donald Trump returned to office last month.