The FCC should ensure no barriers exist in states’ ability to acquire data to investigate rural call completion issues, and there should be no obstacles to the ability of states to coordinate investigations with other states, the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) said in a reply (http://bit.ly/MYEx8C) to a Nov. 8 FCC Further NPRM (http://bit.ly/1k7cjXc) on rural call completion. NASUCA echoed comments by NARUC (http://bit.ly/1jxcecz) that the FCC should codify prohibitions on blocking, choking or restricting traffic, even as appeals of the USF reform order are pending at the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. NASUCA also said intermediate providers should register and certify they will follow industry standards, as well as state and FCC rules, and that no additional safe harbors reducing obligations to collect and retain data should be created. NASUCA objected to Verizon’s reply (http://bit.ly/1mF9j68), which backed adjusting safe-harbor reporting requirements to exempt minimal volumes of traffic for overflow purposes, and to increase the number of intermediate carriers allowed to be used under the safe-harbor provision from one to two. “Verizon’s complaints about ’the already high burdens of complying with the Order’ overlook the tremendous burdens placed on consumers by call completion failures,” NASUCA said. “Requirements that ease consumers’ burdens by preventing call completion failures are reasonable solutions to this industry-created problem.” The FCC November order applied recording, retention, and reporting requirements to large long-distance voice providers, defined as those that make the initial long-distance call path choice for more than 100,000 domestic retail subscriber lines.
The FCC’s proposed reduction in USF rate-of-return support “would negatively impact Big Bend’s operations at a time when the impacts of USF-[intercarrier compensation] reforms are still being implemented and the full impacts are not known,” the Texas telco told officials from several commissioners’ offices and the Wireline Bureau last week, an ex parte filing said (http://bit.ly/1ghtkKO). The bureau’s May staff report recommended reducing the rate of return to between 8.06 and 8.72 percent; that would be “a threat to financial stability” and would harm Big Bend’s ability to get new loans to build out broadband, the telco said. “Service and customers in rural, remote, and high-cost areas like Big Bend’s service area will suffer due to lack of ability to maintain and invest in new network.”
Newest FCC Commissioner Mike O'Rielly took to the official agency blog Wednesday to share his thoughts on E-rate changes (http://fcc.us/1nwynre). There’s widespread agreement that the program is “due for an overhaul,” and O'Rielly supports that effort, he said, with six provisos: E-rate “must not increase costs on consumers” by increasing USF contributions; it “must be offset by reductions elsewhere” within the fund. E-rate “must be refocused on broadband access.” E-rate matching requirements must be consistent with other federal programs; the current local match of as little as 10 percent is “much lower” than other federal programs and “can distort decision making,” O'Rielly said. E-rate funding must leverage private sector networks, “not overbuild them.” E-rate funding “must not over supply,” but rather give schools flexibility to “choose the speeds that best meet their needs.” Finally, O'Rielly said, E-rate program administration must be revised. “By streamlining processes, requiring productive oversight, and providing significant outreach, we can make school participation in E-Rate easier, stretch program dollars, and ultimately benefit more students.”
A resolution urging the FCC to expand the kinds of services whose customers are required to pay into the USF (CD Feb 11 p15) was among six approved unanimously by the NARUC board at the end of the organization’s winter meeting Wednesday. The resolution, proposed by Vermont Public Service Board Commissioner John Burke, urges the FCC to expand the USF contribution base “so that all communications services, including services such as broadband that are required to be offered in order to receive federal support, contribute to USF.” The resolution took no position on whether the size of the fund should be increased. Another resolution, by Michigan Public Service Commissioner Sally Talberg, supports efforts by the FCC to allow a variety of service providers to apply for rural broadband experiments. The resolution also asked the FCC to ensure that funds for the experiments be aimed at ensuring broadband service for rural areas, and that broadband networks deployed in rural areas remain sustainable. A third resolution, by Nebraska Public Service commissioners Tim Schram and Anne Boyle, said the FCC should clarify that rules on 911 location accuracy apply to calls made from both indoors and outdoors. A resolution by Washington Utilities and Transportation Commissioner Philip Jones expressed support and encouragement to the National Association of Public Affairs Networks to establish C-SPAN-like public affairs TV networks in all 50 states. A resolution by District of Columbia Public Service Commissioner Betty Ann Kane urges the FCC to require applicants for the upcoming IP tests to prominently provide information to customers on how to submit complaints to state regulatory agencies or the FCC. Kane’s resolution also asks the FCC to require applicants requesting a waiver of a mandatory condition from the FCC to notify state regulatory commissions and customers. It also asks the FCC to provide adequate opportunity for public comment before granting a waiver.
The FCC should begin making customers of non-wireline services, including broadband, contribute to the USF, some panelists said at NARUC’s winter committee meetings. But NCTA Vice President-State Government Affairs Rick Cimerman said taxing broadband is the wrong approach if a goal is to expand broadband.
NARUC staff approved five telecom-related resolutions Sunday. One offered by Vermont Commissioner John Burke asks the FCC to expand the USF contribution base, “so that all communications services, including services such as broadband that are required to be offered in order to receive federal support, contribute to USF.” Another by Commissioner Sally Talberg, of Michigan, supports efforts by the FCC to allow a variety of service providers to apply for rural broadband experiments. The resolution also urged the FCC to ensure the funds for the experiments not only be aimed at ensuring broadband service for rural areas, but also that broadband networks deployed in rural areas remain sustainable. A third resolution, by Nebraska Commissioners Tim Schram and Anne Boyle, asked the FCC to clarify that rules on 911 accuracy apply both indoors and outdoors. A resolution by Commissioner Philip Jones of Washington state expressed support and encouragement to the National Association of Public Affairs Networks to establish C-SPAN-like networks in all 50 states. Another resolution by South Dakota Commissioner Chris Nelson thanked Jim McConnaughey for his public service. He retired last month as NTIA chief economist.
It’s not for lack of trying that Congress hasn’t overhauled the Communications Act since 1996. In December, House Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., and Communications Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., outlined plans to update the landmark telecom law -- initial stakeholder comments posted online Wednesday (CD Feb 6 p8) (http://1.usa.gov/1dsVahV), hearings and white papers in 2014, a bill in 2015. They are hardly the first lawmakers to say they want to transform the act, which marked its 18th anniversary Saturday. Former staffers and congressional leaders involved in past attempts told us why recent high-profile efforts, such as in 2006 led by Republicans and in 2010 by Democrats, failed to succeed and what those experiences might portend for House Republicans now.
The Free State Foundation said the FCC should take seriously Lifeline changes sought by TracFone (http://bit.ly/LQAyuc), including a proposal that eligible telecommunications carriers be allowed to retain income-based and program-based eligibility documentation. The FCC Wireline Bureau sought comment on the petition (http://bit.ly/1eyjELs). “By now, the Commission should be aware of its problematic rules which erect unnecessary barriers to efficient subscriber eligibility determinations,” FSF said in a blog post Wednesday (http://bit.ly/LzfuHL). “Reforms that help ensure Lifeline subsidies are distributed only to eligible applicants, based on a proper application review process, will help achieve the commendable goals of the program. Unlike those parts of the USF program that distribute subsidies in a more indiscriminate fashion, like the high-cost fund, Lifeline provides targeted subsidies to those in need who meet income eligibility requirements. The Lifeline program is worthwhile, but it can only be sustained if it is administered efficiently and with minimal levels of fraud and abuse. That’s why reforms like those proposed by TracFone are necessary to improve the Lifeline program and to maintain public confidence that Lifeline funds are not being wasted."
Companies, associations and think tanks began weighing in last week on how best to overhaul the Communications Act. House Commerce Committee Republicans announced a desire to update the act in December, and they solicited feedback on their first white paper last month. The deadline for commenting was Friday, and several stakeholders released proposals for tweaking the landmark telecom law, with initial comments emphasizing the role of the marketplace and a need to end regulatory silos.
NARUC will consider five telecom resolutions at its winter meeting in Washington, it confirmed this week, releasing a document with all the drafts (http://t.co/xPNT99ZbXi). One proposed resolution, sponsored by outgoing Telecom Committee Chairman John Burke, a member of the Vermont Public Service Board, would ask the FCC to revamp the contribution side of USF. Another draft resolution proposes to improve rural broadband deployment by allowing utilities and critical infrastructure industries to tap Connect America Fund money in unserved and underserved areas where no incumbent provider is given support. Another possible resolution would back location accuracy standards for wireless 911 calls, both indoor and outdoor. One proposed resolution would encourage the National Association of Public Affairs Networks “to establish public affairs networks in every State” -- non-profit television networks akin to C-SPAN, focused on public access and government transparency -- and have each PUC coordinate with the FCC and state executive branches and legislatures, among other stakeholders, to improve digital communications networks. The final draft resolution would ask the FCC to ensure a consumer protection standard before approving any IP transition trials. If approved, it would ask the FCC to make sure “residential and small business customers in affected areas avoid any (i) degradation in the capability, quality and reliability of voice services; (ii) reduction in the availability of voice service options/providers; or (iii) increase in rates for equivalent voice services (such as federal and State Lifeline services).” None of the drafts is NARUC policy until the NARUC board approves them, and the drafts can be substantially modified or rejected outright when considered by the NARUC telecom subcommittee, which consists of state commission staff members, or the telecom committee, consisting of state regulatory commissioners. The meeting will be Feb. 9-12.