The FCC proposes to provide an 85 percent discount on qualifying connectivity services to support a three-year study on benefits, costs and savings associated with connected care technologies, it said. The agency released a draft NPRM Wednesday to advance the three-year, $100 million USF telehealth pilot called connected care and commissioners vote on it at the July 10 meeting. Commissioner Brendan Carr spoke during a visit to an Appalachian community healthcare clinic in southwestern Virginia Wednesday to demo how remote patient monitoring technologies including mobile apps used with smartphones, tablets and other devices can help track chronic conditions and improve outcomes.
The national Lifeline eligibility verifier adds soft launches June 25 in Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, Vermont, Virginia and West Virginia, said an FCC Wireline Bureau public notice in Tuesday's Daily Digest. Eligible telecom carriers get access to the national verifier during the soft launch. Universal Service Administrative Co. will do training, and additional resources are available on the USAC website. The NV program launched last year in six states (see 1811020058) and has continued to roll out in increments. Lifeline advocates are concerned subscribership is decreasing under the current administration, and they want USAC to ensure the verifier can interface with other government databases to confirm eligibility for the low-income USF subsidy program (see 1901230036). Comments on a computer matching program the commission is testing with USAC, Georgia and Iowa are due Monday (see 1905230041).
Commissioners will consider at the July 10 FCC meeting an NPRM on broadband deployment in multiple tenant environments (MTEs), an order to wrap together and rule on a business data services transport and USTelecom forbearance proceeding, and an NPRM on a connected care telehealth pilot program, Chairman Ajit Pai blogged Tuesday. The NPRM and declaratory ruling on MTEs follows a 2017 notice of inquiry in docket 17-142 (see 1706220036) on "the unique challenges to deploying broadband to apartment, condominium, and office buildings," Pai wrote. The agency wants to decide whether to back or pre-empt a San Francisco code that requires multitenant buildings to allow residents to access competing broadband providers (see 1811140017). The agency will release an order next month that wraps together two related issues, on a business data services transport proceeding (docket 16-143) and a USTelecom petition for unbundled network elements forbearance (docket 18-141), an FCC official said Wednesday. USTelecom and other telco incumbents say they should no longer be required to unbundle and resell access to some of their networks at below-market rates (see 1905140012). Competitive LECs say there's not enough facilities-based competition in all areas to warrant nationwide forbearance (see 1906130005). Pai wrote that the agency plans to "grant relief only where there is actual or potential competition that ensures reasonable prices." Also at the meeting, commissioners will vote on an NPRM on a three-year, $100 million USF telehealth pilot called connected care designed to support eligible healthcare providers to low-income patients outside hospitals and other traditional healthcare facilities. The Wireline Bureau initiated a notice of inquiry (docket 18-213) in August to wide support (see 1809110039). Commissioner Brendan Carr is leading the effort and will offer more details at the July meeting, Pai wrote.
Among the 37 rate-of-return carriers choosing incentive regulation beginning July 1 for lower-speed business data services TDM transport and end-user channel termination services are Accipiter Communications, ComSouth, Consolidated Communications, Hanson Communications and Otelco, said an FCC Wireline Bureau public notice Thursday on docket 17-144. The 37 telcos serving 88 study areas in 29 states had told the bureau of their choice, under a rate-of-return BDS order, the PN said. RoR providers getting model-based or other fixed high-cost USF support can move BDS offerings to incentive regulation effective July 1, 2020, by telling the National Exchange Carrier Association by March 1 and the bureau by May 1, the PN said.
The Q3 USF contribution factor would grow to 24.4 percent, its highest ever, under an FCC proposal in Thursday's Daily Digest and on docket 96-45. The USF contribution factor rose above 20 percent for the first time in Q4 (see 1809120035). Some advocates for the USF urged the FCC to find new sources of contribution to help sustain the program (such as from fees on broadband service) since revenue from interstate telephone charges continues to decline (see 1904020022). The prospect of ever-rising consumer fees played into a recent NPRM on an overall budget cap for the USF program (see 1905310069). The new contribution factor rate for Q3 would be set within 14 days of the announcement without further action from the agency, said an Office of Managing Director public notice.
The 1996 Telecom Act set mandates for ILECs to open networks to competitors, but incumbents say enough competition exists for the FCC to grant USTelecom's petition for forbearance from a requirement to provide unbundled network elements (UNEs) to competitive LECs. At minimum, ILECs seek forbearance wherever there is evidence of facilities-based market competition, such as from a cable provider. CLECs said they still need UNE access (see 1905140012). All sides told us recently to expect the FCC to act soon.
Six rural carriers are asking the FCC for a one-time waiver of penalties for their failure to report geocodes and other location information into Universal Service Administrative Co.'s high-cost universal broadband (HUBB) portal (see 1803010040). Each rural LEC is subject to thousands of dollars in Connect America Fund penalties for missing a deadline to certify they had no locations to report for the first HUBB deadline of March 1, 2018, they said. The petition posted Tuesday in docket 14-58 said the affected RLECs "acted in good faith" and found the requirement to certify even when there were no locations to report "was not explicitly clear." The companies said restoring the USF dollars will serve the public interest because they use the funds to deploy broadband and voice in unserved rural areas. Losing the USF money "was a drastic adjustment" for each of the carriers, "and in some cases the results will directly and negatively impact the rural communities" they serve and could delay network upgrades or deployment of new broadband infrastructure.
The FCC seeks comment by July 15, replies Aug. 12 on an NPRM to set an overall cap for the USF, says a notice for Thursday's Federal Register. The agency announced the NPRM in May (see 1905310069). The proposal is opposed by advocates worried a cap could force USF programs to compete for resources (see 1906110071).
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and other commissioners placed blame for recent hiccups in work to free up spectrum for commercial 5G use squarely on the Commerce Department and NOAA, during a Wednesday Senate Commerce Committee hearing. Pai used the panel to announce pending FCC action to improve the agency's broadband coverage data collection practices, which have come up repeatedly in Capitol Hill communications policy hearings (see 1905150061). Senators also used the panel to probe FCC actions on other communications policy items, including GOP commissioners' public support for T-Mobile's proposed buy of Sprint.
An FCC proposal to cap the USF was opposed by more than 60 advocacy groups. The FCC released an NPRM last month calling for Universal Service Administrative Co. to set an annual budget cap atop the overall USF program (see 1905310069). Among groups opposing the proposal Tuesday are the American Library Association, MediaJustice, NAACP, National Digital Inclusion Alliance, National Tribal Telecommunications Association, NTCA, Rural Wireless Association, Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition, Urban Libraries Council, and WTA. The groups said the FCC should "evaluate and size each program to suit its unique and essential universal service mission." Imposing an overarching cap on the program, they said, would "undermine efforts to ensure that funding for each program is and will remain 'sufficient' to satisfy Congress' mandates for universal service for all." The comments echo early opposition to the proposal (see 1906030059). The agency didn't comment.