According to the International Trade Commission, a section 337 patent complaint on certain cameras and mobile devices, related software and firmware, and components thereof and products containing the same was filed on behalf of HumanEyesTechnologies, Ltd. on March 29, 2012. The proposed respondents are:
The International Trade Administration initiated administrative reviews for certain firms subject to antidumping or countervailing duty orders with February anniversary dates. The ITA has also received a request to revoke in part one antidumping order for one exporter, and a request to defer for one year the initiation of the February 1, 2011, through January 31, 2012, administrative review of the antidumping order on stainless steel bar from Japan. The ITA intends to issue the final results of these reviews no later than February 28, 2013.
The International Trade Administration is publishing notices in the March 30 Federal Register on the following AD/CV proceedings (any notices that announce changes to AD/CV duty rates, the scope, affected firms, or effective dates will be detailed in another ITT article):
The International Trade Administration is amending its recently published final results for its antidumping duty administrative review of steel wire garment hangers from China (A-570-918) in order to correct an error in the AD cash deposit rate for Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. and/or Hong Kong Wells Limited1. The amended rate, which is effective March 30, 2012, is expected to be implemented by U.S. Customs and Border Protection soon.
The International Trade Administration made a preliminary affirmative countervailing duty determination that countervailable subsidies are being provided to exporter/manufacturers of circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe from India (C-533-853). The ITA found a preliminary CV rate 285.95%1, which is effective on March 30, 2012. U.S. Customs and Border Protection is expected to implement these CV cash deposit/bond requirements soon.
The International Trade Administration made a preliminary negative countervailing duty determination that countervailable subsidies are not being provided to producers and exporters of circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe from the United Arab Emirates (C-520-806). The ITA found preliminary CV rates of zero for all exporter/manufacturers. As such, ITA will not direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries of circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe from the UAE, and there will be no CV cash deposit or bond requirements.
The International Trade Administration made a preliminary affirmative countervailing duty determination that countervailable subsidies are being provided to exporter/manufacturers of circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe from Vietnam (C-552-810). The ITA found preliminary CV rates of de minimis to 8.06%, which are effective on March 30, 2012. U.S. Customs and Border Protection is expected to implement these CV cash deposit/bond requirements soon.
The International Trade Commission is publishing notices in the March 29, 2012 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent, and other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will appear in another ITT article):
According to the International Trade Commission, a section 337 patent complaint on certain computer and computer peripheral devices and components thereof and products containing same was filed on behalf of Technology Properties Limited, LLC on March 27, 2012. The proposed respondents are:
The International Trade Commission is asking for comments by about April 6, 2012, on a patent complaint filed on behalf of Microchip Technology Incorporated which alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the U.S., the sale for importation, and the sale within the U.S. after importation of certain semiconductor integrated circuit devices and products containing same (D/N 2888). ITC is asking for comments on any public interest issues that might affect ITC consideration, including whether the issuance of an exclusion order and/or cease and desist order would impact the public interest.