After a prolonged negotiation, DOJ reached agreement with T-Mobile/Sprint and Dish Network (see 1907260021). Justice got five attorneys general onboard from states that hadn't tried to block the multibillion dollar transaction. Industry officials said getting some support from states was important to the department and delayed an announcement by a day, though opposing states are expected to continue their lawsuit in federal court in New York. The California Public Utilities Commission also hasn't approved the deal. DOJ’s consent decree with the companies did little to mollify most critics.
After a prolonged negotiation, DOJ reached agreement with T-Mobile/Sprint and Dish Network (see 1907260021). Justice got five attorneys general onboard from states that hadn't tried to block the multibillion dollar transaction. Industry officials said getting some support from states was important to the department and delayed an announcement by a day, though opposing states are expected to continue their lawsuit in federal court in New York. The California Public Utilities Commission also hasn't approved the deal. DOJ’s consent decree with the companies did little to mollify most critics.
The Supreme Court handed down what's essentially a middle of the road decision in a junk fax case, PDR Network v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, but its decision has implications for the FCC and the communications bar, lawyers following the case said Thursday. The opinion was expected to answered the question of whether the FCC has the long-assumed power to exclusively implement the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (see 1904250006) but stopped well short of that. The issues raised appear far from settled for the FCC, since four of the justices would have gone further, lawyers said.
The FCC is widely seen to be starting from behind in Tuesday’s oral argument in Prometheus IV. That doesn’t mean anyone is certain how the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will react to an incubator program, standing challenges against petitioners, and broadcaster arguments for further deregulation (see 1905220074), said many academics and broadcast attorneys in interviews last week.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s announcing ahead of DOJ his proposed approval of T-Mobile's buy of Sprint bucks some precedent under which the commission almost always announces second. It short-circuits the process and simplifies imposition of conditions on the transaction, said lawyers active in the proceeding. If Justice seeks conditions, it would have had to go to court to oppose the deal absent concessions by the companies. Pai's announcement was coordinated with DOJ, the lawyers said.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s announcing ahead of DOJ his proposed approval of T-Mobile's buy of Sprint bucks some precedent under which the commission almost always announces second. It short-circuits the process and simplifies imposition of conditions on the transaction, said lawyers active in the proceeding. If Justice seeks conditions, it would have had to go to court to oppose the deal absent concessions by the companies. Pai's announcement was coordinated with DOJ, the lawyers said.
An executive of a smaller cable operator called broadband service a utility, speaking alongside the head of America’s Communications Association about the importance of such ISP services. Although neither cable ally favored a common-carrier regulatory approach to broadband service such as Communications Act Title II net neutrality, the two may have -- perhaps inadvertently -- given a talking point to Title II advocates. That's according to later comments from such net neutrality proponents.
An executive of a smaller cable operator called broadband service a utility, speaking alongside the head of America’s Communications Association about the importance of such ISP services. Although neither cable ally favored a common-carrier regulatory approach to broadband service such as Communications Act Title II net neutrality, the two may have -- perhaps inadvertently -- given a talking point to Title II advocates. That's according to later comments from such net neutrality proponents.
Sinclair will have a hard time buying TV stations until outstanding character questions affirmed in an FCC administrative law judge ruling Tuesday (see 1903050022) are resolved, said broadcast attorneys and media brokers in interviews. ALJ Jane Halprin dismissed the agency's Sinclair/Tribune hearing designation order but said the allegations against Sinclair “reasonably warrant a thorough examination,” and should be considered when Sinclair is seeking commission approval for a license transfer or renewal.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected FCC tribal Lifeline support limits and procedures Friday. The 2017 order was vacated and remanded for a new rulemaking in a potential win for wireless resellers like TracFone (see 1902010017). It's a clean win for the order's opponents and the biggest loss for Chairman Ajit Pai so far in court, lawyers said Friday. Others said the FCC likely won’t try a do-over on the order or pursue removal non-facilities-based providers in general from the program.