The U.S. on Jan. 12 opposed a group of importers' bid to add two claims to their case challenging CBP's initiation of an Enforce and Protect Act duty evasion investigation as "untimely" and the interim measures imposed as a violation of the importers' due process rights (Centric Pipe v. United States, CIT Consol. # 25-00182).
In a Jan. 12 reply brief supporting a motion for judgment, importer AM Stone again argued it provided enough information to the Commerce Department for it to make certain calculations in its antidumping duty and countervailing duty reviews of quartz surface products from Malaysia without resorting to facts otherwise available (AM Stone & Cabinets v. United States, CIT # 24-00241).
The Commerce Department properly picked Turkey as a third country comparison market and decided that no adjustment to an antidumping duty respondent's cost of manufacturing was necessary in the AD investigation on melamine from Qatar, the U.S. argued in a Jan. 9 response to petitioner Cornerstone Chemical's motion for judgment at the Court of International Trade (Cornerstone Chemical v. United States, CIT # 25-00005).
Trade Law Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week, in case you missed them. All articles can be found by searching on the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 13 on AD/CVD proceedings:
AD/CVD evasion petitioner U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association opposed a group of importers' bid for leave to amend their complaints in an Enforce and Protect Act case to add two counts to challenge CBP's initiation of the challenged EAPA investigations as "untimely" and the interim measures imposed as a violation of the importers' due process rights (LE Commodities v. United States, CIT Consol. # 25-00182).
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 12 on AD/CVD proceedings:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Jan. 9 issued mandates in two cases: one from importer Nutricia North America on the classification of its medical food imports (see 2511170047) and the other in a countervailing duty case from exporter Kaptan Demir on the decision not to attribute subsidies provided to Kaptan's input supplier to Kaptan itself (see 2511170018) (Nutricia North America v. United States, Fed. Cir. # 24-1436) (Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret v. United States, Fed. Cir. # 24-1431).
The Commerce Department reasonably used the Thailand Board of Investment's Cost of Doing Business in Thailand 2023 report as a benchmark to determine the benefit for Vietnam's "Exemption or Reduction of Rents for Encouraged Industries" subsidy, the Court of International Trade held on Jan. 8.
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 9 on AD/CVD proceedings: