SES' purchase of Intelsat is nothing short of "survival" for the geostationary orbit (GEO) operators in a marketplace where well-funded low earth orbit operators have "dramatically disrupted the already hyper-competitive satellite communications industry across all verticals," the companies said in a paper on LEO disruption. Submitted to DOJ, a redacted version of the paper was posted Thursday in docket 24-267. The two companies are seeking regulatory approval of SES' proposed $3.1 billion purchase of Intelsat (see 240430004). SES and Intelsat said they "face enormous and increasing pressure to adapt, innovate, cut costs, lower prices, and improve services to survive," and without the deal "it is unlikely that either Party acting alone would be able to do that." They said LEO operators enjoy huge cost advantages due to vertical integration. LEOs are the predominant suppliers of satellite capacity, and that capacity influx has commoditized satellite connectivity, "driving down capacity, service, and equipment prices," they said. Traditional GEO customers "increasingly view LEOs as substitute -- and often preferred -- sources of supply," they said. Tens of thousands of LEO satellites are expected to launch in the coming years from SpaceX's Starlink, Eutelsat's OneWeb, Amazon’s Kuiper, Telesat's Lightspeed, three Chinese mega constellations and others, they said. Those LEOs will drive almost all the ten-fold growth in high-throughput satellite capacity expected by 2028, they said. Meanwhile, the average global price of satellite bandwidth for data services has dropped 77% since 2019. SES and Intelsat said combined they account for less than 5% of all HTS capacity, and that is likely to shrink to less than 2% by 2026. They said that, combined, they can invest more resources in ground equipment and platforms. New SES will be better able to develop and fund a next-generation multi-orbit constellation with the throughput, capacity, range and latency characteristics needed "to more vigorously compete, including with well-financed LEO competitors."
Harmonized Tariff Schedule
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) provide classification provisions and duty rates for almost every item that exists. It is a system of classifying and taxing all goods imported into the United States. The HTS is based on the international Harmonized System, which is a global standard for naming and describing trade products, and consists of a hierarchical structure that assigns a specific code and rate to each type of merchandise for duty, quota, and statistical purposes. The HTS was made effective on January 1, 1989, replacing the former Tariff Schedules of the United States. It is maintained by the U.S. International Trade Commission, but CBP is responsible for interpreting and enforcing the HTS.
Search Primer
Term list: Separate terms with spaces, not commas or semicolons.
Multi-word term: Place inside quotes to ensure an exact match (e.g. "China import").
Acronyms: Use all capital letters to ensure the search is not looking for that letter sequence instead.
Required term: If a term must be included in any resulting articles, prefix it with a plus sign (e.g., +CBP).
Excluded term: If a term should be excluded from any articles being found, prefix it with a minus sign (e.g., -ruling).
Singular form: Always use the singular form when doing multi-word terms (e.g. "russian export control" instead of "russian export controls").
Shortest word form: When you have different word forms in a quoted (multi-word) term, you want to only include the shortest version if it is the last part of the expression (e.g., "entity list" instead of "entity listing" or "entity listed").