VFC Solutions, a sanctioned Cypriot investment firm, filed a lawsuit against the Office of Foreign Assets Control for denying its petition to be delisted from the Specially Designated National and Blocked Persons List (SDN List), arguing that the agency acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" by denying the petition based on "speculation and conjecture."

In another new injury determination on remand, the International Trade Commission again “either ignores or glosses over” rainy conditions during the investigation period and evidence that domestic phosphate fertilizer producers refused to sell to certain U.S. customers, telling customers to import the product instead, exporters led by Eurochem and Phosagro said on Nov. 7 (OCP S.A. v. United States, CIT Consol. # 21-00219).

The Court of International Trade on Nov. 7 granted importer Danfoss' motion to reopen its case seeking exclusions from Section 301 China tariffs on its scroll compressors and scroll-type compressors after the court dismissed the case for lack of prosecution. Judge Claire Kelly vacated the dismissal and said the case will remain on the customs case management calendar until Oct. 31, 2026 (Danfoss LLC v. United States, CIT # 23-00214).

Exporter Pipe & Piling Supplies on Nov. 7 said it would appeal a recent Court of International Trade decision dismissing the company's case against the 2022-23 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large diameter welded pipe from Canada for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (see 2509080047). The trade court said Pipe & Piling failed to notify the other interested parties of its lawsuit as required by the USMCA, as required by 19 U.S.C. 1516a(g)(3)(B), adding that this requirement is a jurisdictional one (Pipe & Piling Supplies v. United States, Slip Op. 25-119, CIT # 24-00211).

In a reply to Korean steel exporter Hyundai, steel petitioner Nucor Corp. said Oct. 24 that the Commerce Department, again, was right to base its determination of the de facto specificity of South Korea’s discounted off-peak electricity prices on the fact that three unrelated industries received a large portion of the subsidy (Hyundai Steel Co. v. United States, CIT # 24-00190).

Exporter Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret moved the Court of International Trade on Nov. 6 for a preliminary injunction in its case on the 2022 administrative review of the countervailing duty order on steel concrete reinforcing bar from Turkey. The motion only noted it had the partial consent from the government, since DOJ can't consult with the Commerce Department on the motion until the federal government reopens. Kaptan filed its case last month to contest Commerce's selection of a benchmark to value a subsidized lease provided to Kaptan's affiliate, Nur Gemicilik, in the review (see 2510140030) (Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret v. United States, CIT # 25-00225).

The following lawsuit was filed recently at the Court of International Trade:

A group of solar cell importers and exporters asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to consolidate its appeal of a Court of International ruling vacating the Commerce Department's 2022-2024 duty pause on the collection of antidumping and countervailing duties on solar cells and modules from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam with the government's appeal of the same order (Auxin Solar v. United States, Fed. Cir. # 25-2120).

Importer Danfoss on Nov. 6 moved the Court of International Trade to reopen its case on whether its scroll compressors and scroll-type compressors are exempt from Section 301 duties on China. The trade court dismissed the case on Nov. 4 for lack of prosecution (see 2511050053) (Danfoss LLC v. United States, CIT # 23-00214).

The Court of International Trade assigned on Nov. 4 another International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs case to a three-judge panel consisting of Judges Gary Katzmann, Timothy Reif and Jane Restani (PGN International Group v. Donald J. Trump, CIT # 25-00240).