Streamlining administrative hearings, as proposed by the FCC Enforcement Bureau (see 1909060049), is a good idea but could have little effect, Free State Foundation President Randolph May said. “Truth be told, these days the FCC conducts relatively few evidentiary ‘trial-type’ proceedings before Administrative Law Judges, the type of proceedings in which the Commission’s streamlining proposals, in theory, might have the most practical impact,” May blogged. The exception is agency review of a proposed transaction, he said. “Nothing in the NPRM prevents the Commission from referring factual issues to an ALJ for a trial-type hearing, including cross-examination of witnesses, in a case in which the agency determines that such an evidentiary hearing is warranted,” he said: “But the Commission’s Notice clearly contemplates that, absent a directive to the contrary, most often factual disputes, even those involving motive, intent, or credibility issues, should be susceptible to resolution on a written record rather than in an oral hearing conducted by the administrative law judge or other presiding officer.”
Tribal areas still don’t have all the broadband connectivity they need, though improvements are being made, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said Monday at the National Tribal Broadband Summit. “Bringing high-speed connectivity to rural Tribal lands can be a game-changer,” Pai said: “It ... enables teleworking, job searches, and even starting an online business. It enables patients to consult with specialists without having to drive hours to the nearest hospital. And it enables students to take advanced math and science classes online, if they aren’t offered at the local school.” The Interior Department reports 73.3 percent of rural non-tribal locations have at least one broadband provider, compared with 46.6 percent of rural tribal locations. Pai emphasized tribal areas can obtain 2.5 GHz education broadband service licenses, under rules approved by commissioners in July (see 1907100054). “Before any commercial auction of this spectrum, Tribes can obtain this spectrum for free,” he said: “This is the first time in the FCC’s history that we have ever given Tribal entities what we call a ‘priority window’ to obtain spectrum for wireless broadband. ... I hope that Tribes will take advantage of it.”
Eutelsat met with FCC officials to explain why it left the C-Band Alliance (see 1909030041), saying it may rejoin. “Eutelsat continues to support the CBA’s proposal of employing a secondary markets approach to rapidly clear a significant portion of the 3.7-4.2 GHz band for 5G wireless services," the company said. It "discussed Eutelsat’s views concerning the appropriate role of each stakeholder, the potential allocation of a portion of the reconfiguration proceeds to the U.S. Government, and the treatment of eligible spectrum clearing costs,” said a filing posted Friday in docket 18-122: “Eutelsat expressed its willingness to reconsider actively participating in the CBA going forward if, among other things, the structure and management of the CBA could be altered to better represent the interests of all affected stakeholders.” Office of Engineering and Technology Chief Julius Knapp and Wireless Bureau Chief Donald Stockdale were among those who met with the company. The World Broadcast Unions raised concerns about FCC moves to open the C band for 5G. WBU wants detailed impact studies covering all stakeholders. “With insufficient C-Band spectrum remaining available for broadcasters’ use, existing distribution and collections systems may be compromised, especially in countries with equatorial geography and high rainfall,” WBU said Friday: “Reallocating C-Band frequencies to other services may, over time, increase pressure on the remaining uplink band further limiting its use and compromising existing C-Band users and service reliability, increasing costs to the broadcast community.” Qualcomm stressed the importance of the band to 5G, in a call with FCC staff, including Knapp. “The Commission’s efforts to open the 3.7 GHz band, which already is allocated for mobile use in other countries, is crucial to the success of 5G in the U.S.,” Qualcomm said. CBA and its members, meanwhile, told the FCC it agreed to allow access to confidential information in the C-band proceedings to three officials representing America’s Communications Association. It was an earlier topic of dispute (see 1909120033).
A backer of an alternative plan to free up some C band for 5G and from satellite use is speaking with programmers about that proposal, heard an America's Communications Association video interview by ACA CEO Matt Polka released Friday. It's "no big surprise" those who would have to move, such as with ACA "members, had a lot of questions about how this as going to work, and was this going to be as reliable a delivery service," said Senior Vice President-Government Affairs Ross Lieberman. "Ultimately, they understood the value." Allies of the ACA, Charter Communications and Competitive Carriers Association recommendation to use fiber in place of the satellite spectrum to deliver programming have been having "numerous conversions with programmers, both large and small, sort of a goodwill tour of education," he added. "A lot of the concerns we’ve heard have been just misperceptions." Maybe "our plan wasn't clear enough," and the concerns are being addressed, Lieberman said. "We’re in the process of putting together a supplement to our filing" at the FCC. Liberman has spoken with broadcast and with cable programmers, he told us Friday. "Everybody wants 5G, and I think people also want certainty, so I think the FCC is really trying to get this done as soon as possible," said Charter Vice President-Regulatory Affairs Colleen King. "Programmers have been using the C band for decades," so it takes "some warming up to get to" understand the ACA, Charter and CCA plan, even at her own company's video business, she said. "If we are going to give up this great resource we have, you want to make sure it’s fairly available to everybody" via FCC auction, King said. This plan gives CCA members "a fair shot at getting that spectrum," said CCA General Counsel Alexi Maltas. The C-Band Alliance would provide as much as 300 MHz of spectrum for 5G, less than the ACA consortium seeks. NAB isn't "aware of a single programmer that has endorsed the ACA proposal," a spokesperson emailed. "If that constitutes ‘warming up’" to the plan, he added, "we’re afraid to ask what cooling off looks like.” The CBA, FCC and NCTA declined to comment.
As ISPs increasingly offer low-cost broadband programs similar to Comcast's Internet Essentials (IE), the number of eligible households climbs, though a significant amount of the subsidization goes to households that would have been subscribed anyway. That's per Technology Policy Institute President Scott Wallsten and Stanford University Public Policy Program Director Gregory Rosston, presented Thursday at the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference. The study looked IE from 2011 launch as a voluntary FCC condition on the NBCUniversal acquisition through 2015. It found about 66 percent of subscribers were increases in low-income adoption stemming from the program, the remainder households switching from a competitor ISP or that would have signed up given adoption trends. It said IE-eligible households were more likely to take online courses or training than households in the footprints of other providers. It's unclear whether, when competing ISPs offer similar programs, customers benefit much or if the bonus is to the provider in customer retention. Wallsten told us such programs don't necessarily point to solutions for the digital divide. IE targeted households lacking broadband, and might not fly politically with a government program, meaning automatically broader eligibility for subsidies, he said. As fewer lack connectivity, holdouts become increasingly hard to reach, especially since research shows price isn't the dominant issue, he said, noting IE's heavily reduced monthly bill attracted only a share of the target population online. Comcast didn't comment.
The accelerating rate of cord cutting as vMVPD uptake stumbled shows those over-the-top services aren't a big driver of the trend, said analyst Craig Moffett of MoffettNathanson in an interview on C-SPAN's The Communicators set to run this weekend. He said "the new normal" for traditional pay TV is subscriber declines of 5 percent or so per year. He said there's an ongoing bifurcation between sports watchers and entertainment viewers, with the latter leaving cable and direct broadcast satellite as sports programming's fixed costs keep driving up pay-TV subscription costs. Moffett said the state attorneys general challenge of T-Mobile/Sprint has "reasonably good odds" of derailing the deal since the takeover isn't meaningfully different from the first iteration of the transaction that DOJ rejected. He said it's unlikely any tech giants will be broken up under the current antitrust scrutiny because antitrust laws aren't well suited for that and Congress isn't likely to undertake an overhaul soon. He said net neutrality is a hot-button issue largely because the debate was cast in terms of "bad guy" ISPs and "good guy" companies like Netflix. But net neutrality no longer energizes the base and thus is absent from discussion by the Democratic presidential candidates. Moffett said the U.S. is "still a few years out" from having wide blocks of midband spectrum needed to enable the transformational services 5G promises, so in the near term, it will rely on narrow midband blocks. On vMVPDs, they're struggling because they have "fallen into the same trap" as traditional MVPDs by having to offer increasingly fat and expensive programming bundles, the analyst said. Eventually, live TV will be the home only of sports and news, with all other content moving to on-demand, he said. Cable system operators don't necessarily care about sustaining the bundle and can focus on their broadband offerings, but DBS operators "are in a much tougher position," he said, programmers even more so.
Google’s plan to “implement encrypted Domain Name System lookups into its Chrome browser and Android operating system” could massively interfere with “critical internet functions,” telecom groups wrote Congress Thursday. NCTA, CTIA and USTelecom signed the letters to the Commerce, Judiciary and Homeland Security committees in both chambers. Google plans to implement the change through “a new protocol for wireline and wireless service, known as DNS over HTTPS (DoH),” they wrote. “If not coordinated with others in the internet ecosystem, this could interfere on a mass scale with critical internet functions, as well as raise data competition issues.” Google didn’t comment.
Universal Service Administrative Co. is preparing for "any path forward" in response to FCC plans to impose updated minimum service standards for its Lifeline program starting Dec. 1, Catie Miller, communications manager for USAC's Lifeline program, said Wednesday during a webinar for carriers participating in the program. She said it's preparing its call center to address customer concerns and asked industry stakeholders to let USAC know what other support steps it should take. She said carriers must update the type of Lifeline service their customers have, because this would be the first time reimbursement would change based on whether they have voice-only or voice plus broadband service. Under the minimum service standard changes set for Dec. 1, Lifeline support for voice-only service is reduced to $7.25 per month, and minimum broadband performance is 8.75 GB. Industry and consumer groups oppose the changes and want the FCC to delay them until further study (see 1907310074). They seek prompt response to an industry petition for delay so carriers can inform their customers of service changes, if needed, in time to meet regulatory standards (see 1909130020).
Industry and others should take many steps to ensure phone customers are aware of call blocking options, an FCC advisory panel recommended. At Monday's Consumer Advisory Committee meeting, CAC members unanimously approved the recommendations to the commission (see 1909160019). Text was released Wednesday in docket 17-59. People should get "blocked call information where consumers customarily view information about the call-blocking and labeling service," such as in wireless and wireline customers' online account information, the proposal said. "Consumers should have options to manage robocall blocking preferences, such as through a customer portal, in-store, by phone, or other choices." Customer service personnel should be trained to help, the committee said. "Providers should maintain a webpage that includes information about opt-out blocking and labeling tools, clearly explaining to consumers the robocall-related services provided, which calls are blocked, and how to opt in and out. The service should be provided at no additional line-item charge." Don't forget traditional wireline service, CAC suggested. "Explore potential means to protect legacy copper line customers from illegal robocalls," it asked of telcos. "The FCC should continue to directly collaborate with consumer advocacy groups and industry to educate consumers on the options for and risks of various methods of combatting robocalls." Stakeholders should together consider "public service ad campaigns, possibly including a celebrity spokesperson, to educate and alert consumers to the efforts of government and industry to tackle the robocall epidemic, and to educate and alert consumers to the robocall-blocking options," the group said. The agency seeks default call blocking services to be free, an agency spokesperson confirmed. FCC representatives wouldn't say whether CAC wants the same. “NCTA voted in favor of the recommendation" by CAC, emailed a spokesperson for the association. "We appreciate all the hard work of the ... committee in developing it.” The Competitive Carriers Association, amid its conference in Providence, Rhode Island (see 1909180061), declined to comment. America's Communications Association backed the declaratory ruling allowing "robocall blocking, including popular third-party robocall blocking tools, on an opt-out basis," an ACA spokesperson emailed. It hopes "CAC’s recommendations will provide helpful guidance to voice providers in deploying opt-out call blocking that protects their customers from the torrent of unwanted and illegal robocalls.” Incompas declined to comment, while USTelecom said it didn't have a comment right away.
The Lifeline national verifier now connects with the national Medicaid database to test eligibility, the FCC said Wednesday: Eligibility of about 60 percent of the population can be confirmed automatically. It’s “a major step in the implementation of the Verifier,” said FCC Chairman Ajit Pai. The NV also connects with the Department of Housing and Urban Development and 12 states, the commission said. State officials, Congress members and Lifeline providers ask why the NV rollout had continued without such access (see 1908280013). Connecting the NV with federal Medicaid is a big step, but verifying up to 60 percent of the Lifeline population isn't enough, emailed John Heitmann, counsel for the National Lifeline Association: It should be at least 85 percent. That's happening in Pennsylvania where there's access to the state Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program databases, he said. Manual processes don't reasonably serve needs of the eligible, and the NV shouldn't hard launch "until it has electronic access to both Medicaid and SNAP databases or before service providers have access" to an application programming interface "that allows them to help consumers navigate the verification and enrollment process, including the ability to transmit documentation via the API," Heitmann said. CTIA Vice President-Regulatory Affairs Matt Gerst applauded that "eligible low-income consumers will be able to get support for [their] mobile wireless services."