The Court of International Trade's recent decision in MTD Products v. U.S., which upheld the International Trade Commission's retroactive application of antidumping and countervailing duties on small vertical shaft engines from China, is "particularly instructive" in a case brought by Sweet Harvest Foods, the ITC said in a notice of supplemental authority. In MTD, the trade court upheld an ITC critical circumstances decision "under the same legal framework that applies in the instant case," the commission said (Sweet Harvest Foods v. United States, CIT # 22-00188).
The Court of International Trade shouldn't grant a stay in an antidumping case pending the expiration of the deadline to appeal the court's recent decision in another case that deals with the Commerce Department's use of the Cohen's d test to root out "masked" dumping, two exporters argued March 20. HiSteel Co. and Dong-A Steel Co. said the court shouldn't grant the stay because their action doesn't deal with the same issue as the recent decision in Stupp Corp. v. U.S.
Importers in the massive litigation over President Donald Trump's Section 301 action on China will appeal Court of International Trade rulings upholding the tariffs. Pratik Shah, counsel for lead plaintiffs HMTX Industries and Jasco Products, said he believes the importers' arguments are strong.
The following lawsuit was recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
Canadian company J.D. Irving will appeal a January Court of International Trade decision dismissing its challenge of the Commerce Department's cash deposit instructions to CBP after the 2019 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on softwood lumber products from Canada for lack of jurisdiction. Per the notice of appeal, J.D. Irving will take its case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In the trade court's opinion, Judge Timothy Reif said that the court did not have jurisdiction under Section 1581(i) since jurisdiction would have been available under Section 1581(c) (J.D. Irving v. United States, CIT # 21-00641).
The Court of International Trade in a confidential March 21 opinion upheld parts and sent back parts of the Commerce Department's final results in the first administrative review of the countervailing duty order on aluminum foil from China. In a letter to litigants, Judge Timothy Reif gave the parties until March 28 to review any confidential information in the opinion. The plaintiffs, led by Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., filed a five-count complaint in the proceeding to contest Commerce's calculation of the benchmark for the aluminum sheet, primary aluminum and land for less than adequate remuneration programs. The plaintiffs also contested the agency's decision to reject additional benchmark and land information from Jiangsu Zhongji (Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co. v. United States, CIT # 21-00133).
The Commerce Department dropped its use of a cost-based particular market situation adjustment in an antidumping duty review for exporter Garg Tube on remand at the Court of International Trade, decreasing the company's dumping rate from 13.90% to 8.42% if the remand results are sustained. The agency said that because of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's holding in Hyundai Steel v. U.S., which found such an adjustment illegal under the 2015 Trade Preferences Extension Act (see 2108050070), it no longer was able to make the adjustment in the 2018-19 administrative review of the AD order on welded carbon steel standard pipes and tubes from India (Garg Tube Export v. U.S., CIT # 21-00169).
The Commerce Department legally used a quarterly ratios methodology to set the quantity of subject mattresses sold by respondent Zinus Indonesia in an antidumping duty investigation, the Court of International Trade ruled on March 20. Ruling on seven specific challenges raised by Zinus Indonesia and AD petitioner Brooklyn Bedding, Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves also upheld Commerce's decision to use surrogate financial information from Indian mattress maker Emirates Sleep Systems, calculation and application of a profit cap and adjustment to Zinus U.S.'s reported sales deductions.
Importer Diamond Tools Technology did not make a "material and false statement" and so did not evade the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on diamond sawblades from China via Thailand, CBP said in remand results filed under protest with the Court of International Trade. CBP said it made its finding to bring the proceeding in line with the trade court's remand order, which said that DTT's "failure to declare" its pre-Dec. 1, 2017, imports as subject to the AD order was not a material and false statement under the Enforce and Protect Act (Diamond Tools Tech. v. Unied States, CIT # 20-00060).
The Court of International Trade on March 20 upheld the Commerce Department's withdrawal of a separate-rate questionnaire it had erroneously issued to exporter Jin Tiong Electrical Materials Manufacturer in an antidumping review, finding Commerce's rejection of the company's answers as untimely was proper because the agency had withdrawn the questionnaire before Jin Tiong submitted its response.