House Commerce Committee Republicans renewed their concerns Tuesday with FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel’s draft net neutrality NPRM reclassifying broadband as a Communications Act Title II service (see 2309280084), but no one is expecting GOP members of that panel or elsewhere on Capitol Hill to make a strong push for now on legislation to halt the expected rewrite. Net neutrality legislation would be even more unlikely to pass now amid divided control of Congress than it was last year when Democrats had majorities in both chambers (see 2207280063), lawmakers and lobbyists told us. Lawmakers are less enthusiastic about even pushing a pure messaging bill on the issue amid the current stasis, lobbyists said.
Here are Communications Litigation Today's top stories from last week, in case you missed them. Each can be found by searching on its title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
Consumers' Research filed its second challenge of the FCC's quarterly USF contribution factor in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday. Oral argument for its challenge of the Q1 2022 contribution factor was heard during an en banc hearing in September (see 2309190072). In a new challenge of the Q4 2023 contribution factor, the group said the USF factor is an illegal tax and should be rejected. The petition was posted Tuesday in case 23-60525.
Consumers' Research filed its second challenge of the FCC's quarterly USF contribution factor in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday. Oral argument for its challenge of the Q1 2022 contribution factor was heard during an en banc hearing in September (see 2309190072). In a new challenge of the Q4 2023 contribution factor, the group said the USF factor is an illegal tax and should be rejected. The petition was posted Tuesday in case 23-60525.
Here are Communications Litigation Today's top stories from last week, in case you missed them. Each can be found by searching on its title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
Judges on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals questioned the FCC on how the commission structures its Universal Service Fund and oversees the role the Universal Service Administrative Co. plays in determining quarterly contribution factors during an en banc hearing Tuesday. Some pressed Consumers' Research on how the private nondelegation doctrine applied to its challenge of the Q1 2022 USF contribution factor (see 2309010060).
Judges on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals questioned the FCC on how the commission structures its Universal Service Fund and oversees the role the Universal Service Administrative Co. plays in determining quarterly contribution factors during an en banc hearing Tuesday. Some pressed Consumers' Research on how the private nondelegation doctrine applied to its challenge of the Q1 2022 USF contribution factor (see 2309010060).
The FCC told the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that Consumers' Research's challenge of its Q1 2022 USF contribution factor "lacks merit" and defended the Universal Service Administrative Co.'s role as "exclusively administrative" in establishing quarterly factors. "Congress’s delegation of authority to the FCC amply satisfies the constitutional standard set forth in controlling Supreme Court precedent," said the commission. The USAC "has no policymaking authority" and is "overseen by the FCC at every step," the said in an en banc brief posted Thursday in case 22-60008 (see 2308070033). The FCC also said CR's private delegation challenge should be rejected because USAC "does not exercise regulatory power" or have any policymaking role in administering USF programs.
The FCC told the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that Consumers' Research's challenge of its Q1 2022 USF contribution factor "lacks merit" and defended the Universal Service Administrative Co.'s role as "exclusively administrative" in establishing quarterly factors. "Congress’s delegation of authority to the FCC amply satisfies the constitutional standard set forth in controlling Supreme Court precedent," said the commission. The USAC "has no policymaking authority" and is "overseen by the FCC at every step," the said in an en banc brief posted Thursday in case 22-60008 (see 2308070033). The FCC also said CR's private delegation challenge should be rejected because USAC "does not exercise regulatory power" or have any policymaking role in administering USF programs.
Consumers' Research asked the U.S. Supreme Court to extend the deadline to file its cert petition challenging a 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding the FCC's USF 2021 Q4 contribution factor (see 2305300009). The group asked in an application posted Friday that the court extend the Aug. 28 deadline by 60 days, to Oct. 27, to file its petition. The group noted the 5th Circuit's decision to grant rehearing for its challenge of a separate contribution factor, saying it "signals that it may soon split from the Sixth Circuit on these important nondelegation matters" (see 2306290074).