The IRS properly assessed AT&T more than $505 million in taxes from universal service payments made to the company because the funds should be considered income and not capital contributions, a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled last week. AT&T had lost its case on summary judgment at a lower court and appealed, arguing that its money it got from USF was capital contributions that shouldn’t count as gross income for tax purposes. The panel upheld the summary judgment, ruling that under both the relevant statutes and the Supreme Court’s 1973 U.S. v. CB&Q Railroad decision the government’s intentions in handing out the money are determinative. AT&T officials did not respond to a request seeking comment. An FCC spokesman declined to comment. The court’s decision concluded that the transferor didn’t intend the funds to be a contribution to capital, tax expert Rob Willens said. The funds instead were intended to be a supplement to AT&T’s income to compensate it for the lost revenue and increased costs it incurred in serving low-income, high-cost users, he said. Transfer of funds, as the court said, didn’t exhibit the “characteristics” of a contribution to capital as set forth by CB&Q, Willens noted. He said states would also tax these amounts because most, if not all, states use federal taxable income, with certain adjustments, as the tax base.
Ian Cohen
Ian Cohen, Deputy Managing Editor, is a reporter with Export Compliance Daily and its sister publications International Trade Today and Trade Law Daily, where he covers export controls, sanctions and international trade issues. He previously worked as a local government reporter in South Florida. Ian graduated with a journalism degree from the University of Florida in 2017 and lives in Washington, D.C. He joined the staff of Warren Communications News in 2019.
Search Primer
Term list: Separate terms with spaces, not commas or semicolons.
Multi-word term: Place inside quotes to ensure an exact match (e.g. "China import").
Acronyms: Use all capital letters to ensure the search is not looking for that letter sequence instead.
Required term: If a term must be included in any resulting articles, prefix it with a plus sign (e.g., +CBP).
Excluded term: If a term should be excluded from any articles being found, prefix it with a minus sign (e.g., -ruling).
Singular form: Always use the singular form when doing multi-word terms (e.g. "russian export control" instead of "russian export controls").
Shortest word form: When you have different word forms in a quoted (multi-word) term, you want to only include the shortest version if it is the last part of the expression (e.g., "entity list" instead of "entity listing" or "entity listed").