The Commerce Department erred when using adverse facts available over the reporting of various Malaysian inland freight data in antidumping duty respondent Euro SME's home market and U.S. sales databases, the respondent argued in an Aug. 19 brief at the Court of International Trade. Euro SME further railed against Commerce's use of AFA over the reporting of certain sales data kept in the normal course of business (Euro SME v. United States, CIT #22-00108).
The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Aug. 18 denied a petition for the entire court to rehear a broad challenge to Section 232 tariffs on iron and steel and aluminum products. The Federal Circuit had dismissed the case, led by USP Holdings, in June (see 2206090047), ruling against the importers’ arguments that the Commerce Department in its underlying report was required to find an imminent threat to domestic industry and did not do so. The petition for en banc rehearing cited the Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. EPA, arguing that the appeals court failed to consider the effect of the Administrative Procedure Act on the standard of review in the case (see 2207220071). The order denying the rehearing motion did not lay out any reasoning for the denial (USP Holdings v. United States, Fed. Cir. #21-1726).
The Court of International Trade will put a temporary hold on liquidation of entries of aluminum extrusions imported by Kingtom Aluminio while it considers a preliminary injunction requested by a domestic industry group, it said in an Aug. 18 order (Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee v. United States, CIT # 22-00236).
The Court of International Trade on Aug. 18 granted the government’s request for a voluntary remand in an importer’s challenge to a CBP Enforce and Protect Act evasion finding on tri-bar floors imported in farrowing crates. DOJ had requested the remand a day earlier, seeking to add to the record of the EAPA proceeding a recent Commerce Department scope ruling that also found the tri-bar floors subject to the scope of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel grating from China (Ikadan System USA v. United States, CIT # 21-00592).
The Court of International Trade should uphold a "reasonable" final determination by the Commerce Department that oil country tubular goods made in Brunei and the Philippines from Chinese hot-rolled steel coils are circumventing antidumping and countervailing duties on OCTG from China, intervenors Welded Tube USA, Wheatland Tube Company, and Vallourec Star said in an Aug. 19 brief (HLDS (B) Steel v. United States, CIT #21-00638).
The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
The misclassification of 543 entries of metal lids was simple negligence, not a fraudulent scheme, importer Crown Cork & Seal said in its motion to dismiss parts of an amended government complaint. The motion asks the court to dismiss counts of fraud and gross negligence, leaving only the negligence count (United States v. Crown Cork & Seal, USA, CIT #21-00361).
The Commerce Department erred in its calculations when assigning countervailing duty rates in an administrative review on multilayered wood flooring from China, according to three separate complaints filed at the Court of International Trade. The complaints, all filed on Aug. 17, primarily challenge Commerce's findings of less than adequate remuneration (LTAR) in calculating duty rates and adverse facts applied to the government of China.
CBP and the Commerce Department engaged in several abuses of discretion in a prolonged Enforce and Protect Act investigation into alleged evasion of hardwood plywood, InterGlobal Forest (IGF) said in an Aug. 17 complaint at the Court of International Trade. IGF contests a January EAPA decision that found evidence of evasion and the June decision by CBP's Office of Regulations and Rulings that affirmed it (InterGlobal Forest v. United States, CIT # 22-00240).