Google TV Lapses Seen as Challenge Typifying Next-Gen CE Products
Google TV missed the boat in first-generation products that launched in October by not understanding what the consumer wants, said panelists at the NexGen Entertainment Home Experience panel at the Digital Hollywood 2011 Media Summit in Manhattan Wednesday. The platform should come back strong in subsequent generations, assuming Google addresses issues that limited its appeal the first time out, panelists said. But Google’s stab at an undefined, fast-moving target shows how far the entertainment industry has to go in defining the home entertainment experience of the future.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
Roger Pavane, senior vice president of payment service provider PaymentOne, called the first take of Google TV “too little, too late.” Pavane said Google TV offers no additional value to consumers who want Internet-based content through their TV. “All the services from that home server box have already been duplicated by the ad hoc devices consumers already own,” he said. He acknowledged that multiple HDMI inputs and switching were a bonus of Google TV, but not at the expense of having to “make another capital investment of $300-$500."
Google TV’s text search approach using a remote control is “totally wrong for TV,” said Dale Roberts, chief technology officer for Gracenote, who said a tablet would have been a better interface. “The best you can do with a $50 remote control isn’t anything compared with what you can do with an iPad or a smartphone today,” he said. Although “they did a lot of things right,” including multiple OTT service options, there were “basic user interface problems,” he said. Lack of a social media component through Facebook was another drawback, he said.
By offering consumers another set-top box, Google TV “is going in the wrong direction,” said Travis Parsons, vice president of corporate development at Sezmi, which offers a hybrid broadcast/niche Internet content solution. “Consumers want fewer boxes” and “one solution,” and none of the next-gen services, “whether it’s Google TV, Apple TV, or Netflix,” are offering the complete package that consumers want, which includes broadcast TV, he said. Live, over-the-air TV “still represents 50-plus percent of the most popular content out there,” he said.
Describing a “step-by-step” process that’s more “hits than misses,” Gregg Bernard, senior vice president of business development for Vimeo, said content providers viewed Google TV as a first-generation product with “a lot of trial-and-error going on.” He compared it to Sony’s DASH personal Internet viewer that taps into cloud-based content and has no onboard storage. “I don’t think it’s resonating with consumers yet, but cloud-based content distribution is the future,” he said.