OPASTCO said Tues. it was upset with way many state PUCs were allowing competitive carriers to receive Universal Service Fund (USF). Group said it would start pushing message to Congress that states were straying from congressional intent of Telecom Act of 1996 and that FCC needed more oversight of PUCs. With OPASTCO members in Washington for annual legislative and regulatory conference, many were planning to meet with members of Congress this week in attempt to put more focus on USF issues, particularly designations of eligible telecom carrier (ETC) by state PUCs.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
What is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)?
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is the U.S. federal government’s regulatory agency for the majority of telecommunications activity within the country. The FCC oversees radio, television, telephone, satellite, and cable communications, and its primary statutory goal is to expand U.S. citizens’ access to telecommunications services.
The Commission is funded by industry regulatory fees, and is organized into 7 bureaus:
- Consumer & Governmental Affairs
- Enforcement
- Media
- Space
- Wireless Telecommunications
- Wireline Competition
- Public Safety and Homeland Security
As an agency, the FCC receives its high-level directives from Congressional legislation and is empowered by that legislation to establish legal rules the industry must follow.
Latest News from the FCC
Technology companies opposed petition that asked FCC to require retailers of 2-way voice or data radio equipment, excluding mobile phones, to undertake detailed record-keeping on customers. Dale Reich, self-described retail vendor of used radio equipment, petitioned FCC in Nov. to require retailers of such equipment, including unlicensed devices, to keep records of buyers’ names, addresses, phone numbers, signatures. CompUSA, Intersil, Symbol Technologies, Vanu and XtremeSpectrum jointly opposed petition Fri., citing burdens such requirements would impose without regulatory purpose. Such mandates would threaten market for consumer wireless devices such as Wi-Fi, filing said. “Emerging technologies such as ultra-wideband would be cut off before they can establish a foothold,” companies said. Requested labeling and record-keeping would extend to devices such as cordless phones, wireless speakers, garage door openers, baby monitors and wireless toys, joint comments said. Request would have FCC require ownership tagging for certain radios, including Part 15 devices, used beyond operator’s home area, which would include information such as whether license was required and FCC call sign or file number. “It is simply not feasible for the checkout clerks at CompUSA or Toys ‘R’ Us to interrupt their duties to fill out purchaser-specific paperwork, open boxes and prepare and apply individualized labels,” filing said. Petitioners raised concern that under proposal retailers would have to keep large amount of material “private from unauthorized inspection, yet accessible to a ‘reasonable request’ from law enforcement officials; and a retailer can invite police inspection if it suspects the radios are used unlawfully.” That means retailers would have to make “close judgment calls” on which law enforcement requests were reasonable and “what observations about a customer create a sufficient suspicion to justify showing the records to police,” filing said. Companies said no govt. agency required such detailed level of records for any consumer product other than vehicles. Agere Systems opposed Reich’s petition, citing potential impact on devices that operate under Part 15 unlicensed rules. Agere said petition was without merit, would impose unnecessary burdens on FCC and retailers and would “represent an unwarranted invasion of privacy of the purchasers of such equipment for no legitimate regulatory purpose.” It said Reich had failed to establish problem that record-keeping proposals would address. IEEE group raised similar concerns, including invasion of privacy involving consumer purchases. IEEE 802.18 radio regulatory technical advisory group said proposals “fly in the face of federal preemption of local and state regulation of radio communications devices, which the Commission reserves to itself the right to regulate.” Local agencies don’t have authority over such matters because of federal preemption of state and local regulation of such radio communications devices, IEEE group said.
FCC’s recent mobile satellite service (MSS) order chose less conservative emissions limits to protect GPS from ancillary terrestrial operations than power levels that were advocated by NTIA, private sector and other agencies, including Defense Dept. Five days before FCC adopted order Jan. 29, NTIA raised concerns that out-of-band power limits ultimately approved for ancillary terrestrial service would “significantly degrade” performance of GPS receivers to meet Enhanced 911 accuracy requirements. NTIA and FCC reached agreement that entailed latter’s Office of Engineering & Technology’s soliciting comments “shortly” on what changes, if any, were needed in GPS protection, NTIA Dir. Nancy Victory said.
NARUC is forming 2 task forces to address state-related issues arising out of last week’s FCC Triennial Review order on UNEs (CD Feb 21 p1). Meanwhile, NARUC speakers at group’s annual winter meeting in Washington explored potential ramifications of Commission’s order on states and industry.
NARUC is scheduled to consider telecom policy resolutions at its winter meeting this week in Washington, addressing spam, Internet telephony, emergency spectrum, broadband, universal service and competition. Draft resolutions proposed for adoption would: (1) Call on FCC and FTC to take action against deceptive marketing tactics by mass e-mail advertisers, such as misleading subject lines, false routing information, invalid opt-out provisions. Draft resolution doesn’t take position on no-spam lists that many states are considering, but does urge state commissions to put consumer information about spam on their public Web sites. (2) Ask FCC to reject AT&T petition seeking access charge exemption for voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephone service because move would throw into turmoil most existing state and federal universal service and intercarrier compensation arrangements. Draft said FCC shouldn’t consider granting AT&T’s request until it first conducted proceeding, through joint conference with states, to throughly examine impacts. (3) Call for more emergency communications spectrum and more state participation in national emergency communication coordination efforts. (4) Ask Congress, FCC and other policymakers to take stances on wireless and landline technology issues that would encourage broadband Internet access. (5) Ask FCC to consider switch to connection-based rather than revenue-based system for universal service assessments, where carriers’ contributions would be based on quantity of phone numbers assigned to end- users and on capacity of private lines in service; benefits would include more efficient use of number supplies. (6) Ask FCC to open rulemaking on establishing minimum requirements for exchange of customers’ account information when they changed carriers, such as which customer data fields must be exchanged and time frames for information exchange between carriers. Meeting runs through Feb. 26.
Environmental groups took their challenge to FCC’s environmental requirements for antenna structures to U.S. Appeals Court, D.C., last week. American Bird Conservancy, Forest Conservation Council and Friends of the Earth asked court to direct FCC to prevent new towers from being built until it completed program environmental impact statement on its tower licensing decisions in Gulf Coast area. Groups also want new tower approvals halted until Commission implements requirements for bird protection measures and initiates certain public participation procedures.
FCC’s long-awaited and much-lobbied Triennial UNE Review is on agenda for Commission’s open meeting Feb. 13. Most observers said it was doubtful agency would be ready to issue order after Commission voted at meeting and instead would provide news release outlining Commission’s action in broad terms. That approach isn’t unusual and was taken by FCC several times while it was implementing 1996 Telecom Act under tight statutory deadlines. One lobbyist speculated that order probably wouldn’t be issued for another month because it would take staff that long to put substance on decisions and compromises of commissioners at last min.
FCC Chmn. Powell’s legal adviser on media issues, Susan Eid, told Precursor Group conference Tues. that reality was that there were unprecedented levels of competition, diversity and choice in broadcast TV market. Prime-time viewing of broadcast has declined more than 30% in last decade because of competition from cable, she said. Cable captures 20% of ad revenue now, she said, and she believes clustering of cable systems will cause that industry to “compete much more aggressively and, frankly, effectively” with local broadcasters in terms of local content and advertising.
General Accounting Office (GAO) report released Mon., citing past govt. difficulties in resolving conflicts among spectrum users, called for independent federal commission to examine U.S. spectrum management. Report, requested by Sens. Hollings (D-S.C.) and Burns (R-Mont.), said NTIA and FCC already had stepped up communications on spectrum issues but “their different jurisdictional responsibilities appear likely to result in piecemeal efforts that lack the coordination to facilitate major policy changes.”
Mobile satellite service (MSS) providers will have option to use ancillary terrestrial component (ATC) to supplement their satellite services under certain conditions, FCC said Thurs. Text of order wasn’t available by our deadline, but news release outlined key points, which included 8 different gating criteria and covered interference concerns for 2-GHz and L-band. Commission also adopted rulemaking on Big Leo band to address additional spectrum issues. As part of 5 interlocking items released Thurs., Commission reallocated 30 MHz from MSS band at 2 GHz for 3G wireless. CTIA still called actions “split decision for consumers,” saying it was likely to challenge ATC order.