The International Trade Commission published notices in the Oct. 26 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent or other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will be in another ITT article):
The Commerce Department published notices in the Federal Register Oct. 26 on the following AD/CV duty proceedings (any notices that announce changes to AD/CV duty rates, scope, affected firms or effective dates will be detailed in another ITT article):
The Commerce Department issued the preliminary results of its antidumping duty administrative review on frozen warmwater shrimp from China (A-570-893). The agency found 134 companies did not cooperate in the review, assigning them to the China-wide entity with a rate of 112.81%. If the agency's finding is continued in the final results, importers of subject merchandise from these 134 companies entered Feb. 1, 2021, through Jan. 31, 2022, will be assessed AD duties at that 112.81% rate. An AD duty cash deposit rate of 112.81% would take effect for these 134 companies upon publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. See Commerce's notice for a full list of these companies.
The Commerce Department issued the preliminary results of its antidumping duty administrative review on uncovered innerspring units from China (A-570-928). The agency found Bomei Tex Ltd. and Saffron Living Co., Ltd. did not cooperate in the review, assigning both companies to the China-wide entity with a rate of 234.51%. If the agency's finding is continued in the final results, importers of subject merchandise from Bomei and Saffron Living entered between Feb. 1, 2021, and Jan. 31, 2022, will be assessed AD duties at that 234.51% rate. An AD duty cash deposit rate of 234.51% would take effect for Bomei and Saffron Living upon publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register.
The Commerce Department is launching an anti-circumvention inquiry to determine whether lawn mower sub-assemblies imported from China and attached to a motor in the U.S. should be subject to antidumping and countervailing duties on walk behind lawn mowers from China (A-570-129/C-570-130), the agency said in a notice released Oct. 26.
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on polyethylene terephthalate film from Taiwan (A-583-837). Commerce continued to find, as it did in the preliminary results of this review, that Nan Ya Plastics Corp. did not undersell subject merchandise during the period of review, assigning the company a zero percent AD duty rate. Subject merchandise from Nan Ya entered between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, will be liquidated without any assessment of AD duties, and future entries of subject merchandise exported by Nan Ya won't be subject to AD duty cash deposit requirements until further notice. The new AD duty cash deposit rate takes effect Oct. 26, the day the final results were published in the Federal Register.
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on finished carbon steel flanges from Spain (A-469-815). These final results will be used to set final assessments of AD duties on importers for subject merchandise entered June 1, 2020, through May 31, 2021.
The Commerce Department issued its final determination in the antidumping duty investigation on superabsorbent polymers from South Korea (A-580-914). Cash deposit rates set in this final determination take effect Oct. 27, the date it is scheduled for publication in the Federal Register.
The International Trade Commission published notices in the Oct. 25 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent or other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will be in another ITT article):
Public interest statements on a possible exclusion order on imported golf club shaft and head adapters are due to the International Trade Commission by close of business Nov. 3, ITC said in a notice. The notice follows a ruling by the ITC in which it found the lone respondent, Top Golf Equipment, to be in default after the company failed to respond to various investigation deadlines. The ITC is now considering a permanent limited exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order against Top Golf.