The International Trade Administration published notices in the June 15 Federal Register on the following AD/CV proceedings (any notices that announce changes to AD/CV duty rates, the scope, affected firms, or effective dates will be detailed in another ITT article):
The International Trade Administration issued the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on honey from Argentina (A-357-812), which sets an AD cash deposit rate for nine exporters. These rates, which are effective June 18, 2012, are expected to be implemented by U.S. Customs and Border Protection soon.
The International Trade Administration published notices in the June 15 Federal Register on the following AD/CV proceedings (any notices that announce changes to AD/CV duty rates, the scope, affected firms, or effective dates will be detailed in another ITT article):
The U.S. Trade Representative instructed the International Trade Administration to implement the results of its Section 129 recalculations of the antidumping cash deposit rates currently in effect for companies whose merchandise is subject to 8 AD duty orders on certain products originating from the European Union and Japan, in order to implement the WTO’s findings in three zeroing disputes. Section 129 determinations are prospective in nature. The ITA said these final results will not determine assessment rates for entries of subject merchandise made during the period of review in question, but only cash deposit rates on entries beginning June 8, 2012 (the date of the USTR’s implementation letter. The ITA will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to implement these recalculated AD cash deposit rates soon.
The International Trade Commission is publishing notices in the June 14 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent, and other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will appear in another ITT article):
HTC dropped an appeal at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit of the International Trade Commission’s finding that Apple’s iPhones do not violate certain patents held by HTC. In February, the ITC had terminated the its investigation of certain portable electronic devices and related software (337-TA-721) with respect to Apple’s portable electronic devices that utilize certain power management methods and may incorporate hardware and software for telephone directories within mobile telephone systems. The investigation was one of many proceedings between Apple and HTC, including one that resulted in the issuance of a limited exclusion order against HTC phones in December 2011, and a recent patent complaint pending institution of an investigation filed by Apple against HTC on June 4.
The International Trade Commission is publishing notices in the June 13 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent, and other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will appear in another ITT article):
The International Trade Commission issued a limited exclusion order related to asserted claims of certain patents of certain mobile devices, associated software, and components thereof (337-TA-744) against respondent Motorola Mobility, Inc. of Libertyville, New Jersey, which was found by an administrative law judge to be in violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 due to infringement of claims of patent no. 6,370,5661. The ITC further determined that a bond of $0.33 per device is required to permit temporary importation during the 60-day Presidential review period under 19 USC 1337(j). The investigation and limited exclusion order were requested by Microsoft.
The International Trade Commission is publishing notices in the June 12 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent, and other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will appear in another ITT article):
The International Trade Administration published notices in the June 12 Federal Register on the following AD/CV proceedings (any notices that announce changes to AD/CV duty rates, the scope, affected firms, or effective dates will be detailed in another ITT article):