The Commerce Department reasonably found on remand in a case on a new shipper review that exporter Co May Import-Export Company didn't have a bona fide sale of subject merchandise during the review period, petitioner Catfish Farmers of America argued. Filing comments in support of Commerce's remand decision at the Court of International Trade, the petitioner said the remand determination "fully and appropriately responds to the Court’s opinion" and is otherwise legal and supported by the record (Catfish Farmers of America v. United States, CIT # 24-00126).
The Commerce Department erred by including manufacturer Tecnicas de Fluidos' products within the scope of the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe from Mexico and by collapsing respondent Maquilacero and Tecnicas, its affiliate, in the 2022-23 administrative review of the order, Maquilacero and Tecnicas argued in a motion for judgment (Maquilacero v. United States, CIT # 25-00176).
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Dec. 31 on AD/CVD proceedings:
The following lawsuits were filed recently at the Court of International Trade:
Trade Law Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week, in case you missed them. All articles can be found by searching on the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
A group of importers opposed the government's motion to dismiss the companies' counterclaims in a customs penalty case for lack of jurisdiction or cause of action, arguing that their claims are properly being raised as counterclaims and don't need to independently qualify for the trade court's other jurisdictional grants (United States v. Lexjet, CIT # 23-00105).
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Dec. 30 on AD/CVD proceedings:
The U.S. voluntarily dismissed one of its appeals concerning a scope proceeding on magnesia carbon bricks (MCBs) from China, though the dismissal doesn't affect the government's related appeal on the same proceeding (Fedmet Resources v. United States, Fed. Cir. #'s 26-1160, 26-1245).
The U.S. defended its decision made on remand to include exporter Cheng Shin's temporary-use (T-type) tires within the scope of the antidumping duty order on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from Taiwan. Responding to comments from Cheng Shin on Dec. 22 at the Court of International Trade, the government said Commerce reasonably found that Cheng Shin's tires "are of a size that fits passenger cars and, therefore, are in-scope merchandise," and additionally don't qualify for the exclusion for temporary tires (United Steel Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, v. United States, CIT # 24-00165).
The Commerce Department erred in assigning total adverse facts available to respondent Vinlong Stainless Steel (Vietnam) in the 2022-23 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from Vietnam, Vinlong and importer Norca Industrial argued in a Dec. 23 motion for judgment at the Court of International Trade (Norca Industrial Company v. United States, CIT # 25-00132).