The Commerce Department legally used a quarterly ratios methodology to set the quantity of subject mattresses sold by respondent Zinus Indonesia in an antidumping duty investigation, the Court of International Trade ruled on March 20. Ruling on seven specific challenges raised by Zinus Indonesia and AD petitioner Brooklyn Bedding, Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves also upheld Commerce's decision to use surrogate financial information from Indian mattress maker Emirates Sleep Systems, calculation and application of a profit cap and adjustment to Zinus U.S.'s reported sales deductions.
The Commerce Department failed to follow a Court of International Trade directive in its remand results concerning Yama Ribbons and Bows' alleged receipt of benefits from China's Export Buyer's Credit Program, said Yama in its March 17 response brief (Yama Ribbons and Bows v. U.S., CIT # 20-00059). Yama asked the court to instruct Commerce to apply an appropriate rate for the EBCP not based on adverse facts.
The Commerce Department erred when it used adverse facts available against Korean exporter SeAH Steel Corp.'s alleged benefits under the Export-Import Bank of Korea's (KEXIM's) Performance Guarantee program, SeAH argued in a May 17 motion for judgment at the Court of International Trade. Commerce illegally used adverse facts available in assigning SeAH a 1.33% CVD rate when it found that a 2019 KEXIM guarantee amounted to "untimely new factual information" (SeAH Steel Corp. v. U.S., CIT # 22-00338).
Importer Diamond Tools Technology did not make a "material and false statement" and so did not evade the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on diamond sawblades from China via Thailand, CBP said in remand results filed under protest with the Court of International Trade. CBP said it made its finding to bring the proceeding in line with the trade court's remand order, which said that DTT's "failure to declare" its pre-Dec. 1, 2017, imports as subject to the AD order was not a material and false statement under the Enforce and Protect Act (Diamond Tools Tech. v. Unied States, CIT # 20-00060).
The Commerce Department failed to correctly apply quarterly cost methodology in an antidumping duty review of certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length (CTL) plate from Italy, exporter Officine Tecnosider said in a March 17 motion for judgment at the Court of International Trade (Officine Tecnosider v. U.S., CIT # 23-00001).
The Court of International Trade on March 20 upheld the Commerce Department's withdrawal of a separate-rate questionnaire it had erroneously issued to exporter Jin Tiong Electrical Materials Manufacturer in an antidumping review, finding Commerce's rejection of the company's answers as untimely was proper because the agency had withdrawn the questionnaire before Jin Tiong submitted its response.
CIT Sustains Commerce's Rejection of Exporter's Additional Cost Reconciliation Info, Use of 'd' Test
The Commerce Department properly refused to factor a company’s alleged losses related to the company's failure to convert certain expenses from U.S. dollars to Canadian dollars into the cost of manufacturing wind towers from Canada, the Court of International Trade said March 20. Antidumping duty respondent Marmen didn’t qualify for the adjustments because its exchange gains and losses were already accounted for in the antidumping duty investigation on utility scale wind towers from Canada, Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves said in an opinion.
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices March 20 on AD/CVD proceedings:
The following lawsuit was recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
After a fifth remand order, the Commerce Department assigned a zero percent all-others dumping margin in a less-than-fair-value investigation onf certain hardwood plywood products from China, according to remand results released March 16 (Linyi Chengen Import and Export Co., Ltd., et al. v. U.S., CIT Consol. # 18-00002).