The Court of International Trade in an Oct. 11 opinion partially sustained and partially remanded the Commerce Department's eighth review of the countervailing duty order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from China. Judge Jane Restani granted the U.S. request for a remand regarding China's Export Buyer's Credit Program and the datasets used to set a benchmark for ocean freight. The court also sent back Commerce's use of a 2010 Thai Coldwell Banker Richard Ellis report in setting the land value benchmark and its de jure specificity finding regarding benefits received from a program that makes income from investment gains derived by a resident enterprise via direct investment in another resident enterprise tax exempt. Restani upheld Commerce's 2017 benefit finding regarding land leases, which was left to coexist in the present review period.
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Oct. 10 on AD/CVD proceedings:
Canada and the U.S. issued statements about a panel decision on softwood lumber under NAFTA's AD/CVD dispute chapter, but the antidumping duty case, which was brought years ago under NAFTA, not under its successor, is not posted on the USMCA Secretariat's docket, and neither country would share the ruling.
The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
The Court of International Trade set a briefing schedule in a case on the antidumping duty investigation on mattresses from Thailand following the departure of respondent Saffron Living Co. from the case. Plaintiffs, led by U.S. company Brooklyn Bedding, are to compile and serve their soft appendix within seven days of the Oct. 6 order and then are to file their comments on the Commerce Department's remand results within seven days of the appendix being filed. The U.S. will file its response no later than 15 days after the remand comments (Brooklyn Bedding v. U.S., CIT # 21-00285).
The use of adverse facts in an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on multilayered wood flooring from China, and the resulting recalculation of rates for separate rate companies, were unlawful and inconsistent with the facts, a group of separate rate respondents led by Jiangsu Guyu International Trading (Jiangsu) said in their Oct. 5 remand comments to the Court of International Trade. Commerce deviated from its established practice when it assigned a separate rate to Jinlong and so it should similarly deviate in recalculating the average rate assigned to the non-individually reviewed companies, Jiangsu said (American Manufacturers of Multilayered Wood Flooring v. U.S., CIT # 21-00595)
Commerce has wide discretion to change how it defines how a subsidy is specific in countervailing duty cases, countervailing duty petitioners led by Ellwood City Forge Co. said in Oct. 6 remand comments at the Court of International Trade that argued in favor of Commerce's continued finding in a CVD investigation on forged steel fluid end blocks that Germany's KAV program was de jure specific (BGH Edelstahl Siegen v. U.S., CIT # 21-00080).
The Commerce Department made no changes to the final results of the 2019 administrative review of the countervailing duty order on corrosion-resistant steel goods from South Korea, in its Oct. 5 remand results. Commerce said that, in accordance with the court's July remand order (see 2307100028), it further explained its decision-making process for finding that three debt-to-equity restructurings provided a countervailable benefit, that a benefit passed to the new ownership, and that the uncreditworthy benchmark rate and unequityworthy discount rate were correctly calculated and applied (KG Dongbu Steel Co. v. U.S., CIT # 22-00047).
The Court of International Trade sustained the Commerce Department's zero percent rate for non-individually examined companies in the fifth remand redetermination of the antidumping duty investigation of hardwood plywood products from China. Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves in an Oct. 10 opinion sustained Commerce's separate rate along with its decisions to exclude Dehua TB and Jiangyang Wood from, and to include Sanfortune Wood and Longyuan Wood within, the order. Commerce ultimately decided on the zero rate under protest after Choe-Groves disallowed the use of a 57.36% rate, calculated using only de minimus and AFA rates (see 2303170047).
The EU's decision to open a countervailing duty investigation on electric vehicle batteries from China lacks sufficient evidence and violates World Trade Organization commitments, China's Ministry of Commerce said Oct. 4, according to an unofficial translation. The ministry characterized the move as "naked protectionism."