CertiFit, a Utah-based auto parts importer, on May 4 filed a complaint with the Federal Maritime Commission against Evergreen Line, accusing the ocean carrier of violating shipping regulations. CertiFit accused Evergreen of "systematically failing to meet its commitments" under a service contract, "refusing tendered cargo, refusing to provide empty containers, failing to provide necessary information concerning booking issues, and a refusal to deal," the complaint said. CertiFit is seeking reparations for Evergreen's alleged violations of the Shipping Act.

Over half of charge complaints submitted to the Federal Maritime Commission have been resolved by the parties agreeing to a settlement, FMC Managing Director Lucille Marvin said during a May 3 FMC meeting. More than half of what comes in gets settled "almost right away," Marvin said. Once "regulated entities see that we're involved, they come back to the table and issue refunds or waivers."

Congress should amend shipping regulations to give the Federal Maritime Commission jurisdiction over certain fees assessed by railroads under ocean bills of lading, more than 70 trade groups, including the National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America, said in a May 2 letter to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. The groups said those charges should be billed through the contracting carrier and be subject to demurrage and detention invoicing requirements that were included as part of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act.

Orient Overseas Container Line has "a long history of maintaining the highest standards of regulatory compliance in the U.S. and elsewhere and an equally longstanding tradition of strong customer relationships and excellent customer service," the company emailed May 1 after being accused by Bed Bath & Beyond of violating U.S. shipping regulations. "We will continue to work with our customers and all relevant authorities to resolve any disputes in a professional, efficient, and amicable manner." Bed Bath & Beyond filed a complaint at the Federal Maritime Commission last week saying OOCL failed to meet "minimum quantity commitments" as part of a contract between the two companies (see 2305010049).

Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.

Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) said shipping company Orient Overseas Container Line Limited (OOCL) failed to meet "minimum quantity commitments" as part of a contract with BBBY and imposed unfair detention and demurrage charges. In an April 27 complaint filed with the Federal Maritime Commission, BBBY asked the FMC to investigate OOCL for violations of the Shipping Act, order the company to put reasonable detention and demurrage practices in place and require it to pay reparations for the conduct.

NEW ORLEANS -- Federal Maritime Commissioner Max Vekich signaled he’s open to a further expansion of FMC authority, including potentially allowing the FMC to scrutinize certain rail storage fees.

NEW ORLEANS -- Charge complaints before the Federal Maritime Commission are increasingly trending toward significant settlements or awards, industry officials said, urging shippers to file complaints if they believe they’re facing unfair carrier practices. Carriers are choosing to settle rather than draw the FMC’s attention, they said, especially for complaints involving demurrage or detention fees.

NEW ORLEANS -- The National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America is preparing to ask Congress to allow the Federal Maritime Commission to exercise jurisdiction over certain rail storage fees. NCBFAA is drafting a letter to Reps. John Garamendi, D-Calif., and Dusty Johnson, R-S.D. -- the two House authors of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act -- that could ask the lawmakers to require the FMC to more forcefully regulate rail-assessed demurrage fees charged on ocean containers traveling inland.

A new House bill could allow the Federal Maritime Commission to block certain “anticompetitive” agreements between ocean carriers and marine terminal operators without first having to secure a federal court order. Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif., introduced the bill, called the Ocean Shipping Competition Enforcement Act, after FMC Commissioners Max Vekich and Carl Bentzel asked him to “make this critical change in federal law,” Garamendi said.