The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on steel wire garment hangers from China (A-570-918) (here). Commerce calculated an AD rate of 23.09% for Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., and its affiliate Hong Kong Wells Ltd. Commerce will assess AD duties at importer-specific rates on subject merchandise from Shanghai Wells and Hong Kong Wells entered Oct. 1, 2014, through Sept. 30, 2015. A 23.09% AD duty cash deposit rate for Shanghai Wells and Hong Kong Wells takes effect April 17.
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review and new shipper review on freshwater crawfish tail meat from China (A-570-848) (here). Commerce determined all three companies in the administrative review -- China Kingdom (Beijing) Import & Export Co., Ltd.; Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.; and Hubei Nature Agriculture Industry Co., Ltd. -- did not undersell subject merchandise during the period of review, assigning each a zero percent AD duty rate. In the new shipper review, Commerce also calculated a zero percent AD rate for subject merchandise produced and exported by Hubei Qianjiang Aquatic Food and Product Co., Ltd.
The Commerce Department announced its final affirmative antidumping duty determinations in investigations on carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plate from Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, as well as a final affirmative CV duty determination for the South Korea, in a March 30 fact sheet (here).
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on steel nails from China (A-570-909) (here). These final results will be used to set final assessments of AD duties on importers for subject merchandise entered Aug. 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015.
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on uncovered innerspring units from China (A-570-928) (here). Commerce found the only exporter under review -- Enchant Privilege Sdn Bhd -- did not demonstrate independence from state control, assigning it the China-wide AD duty rate of 234.51%. Enchant Privilege is based in Malaysia, so the rate only applies to the company's Chinese-origin innerspring units. Commerce will assess AD duties at this rate on subject merchandise from China exported by Enchant Privilege and entered between Feb. 1, 2015, and Jan. 31, 2016. A 234.51% AD duty cash deposit rate takes effect March 16 for Chinese-origin innerspring units exported by Enchant Privilege.
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on magnesium metal from China (A-570-896) (here). Commerce found both companies under review -- Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd. (TMI) and Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd. (TMM) -- had no shipments of subject merchandise to the U.S. during the period of review. As such, AD cash deposit rates for these two companies will remain at the rates set for each company in the most recently completed proceeding (i.e., the original final determination or a prior administrative review).
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on xanthan gum from China (A-570-985) (here). These final results will be used to set final assessments of AD duties on importers for subject merchandise entered July 19, 2013, through June 30, 2014.
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on xanthan gum from China (A-570-985) (here). These final results will be used to set final assessments of AD duties on importers for subject merchandise entered July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015.
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on small diameter graphite electrodes from China (A-533-929) (here). Commerce found all companies under review -- the Fangda Group, Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co., Ltd., and Jilin Carbon Import and Export Company -- had no shipments of subject merchandise to the U.S. during the period of review. As such, AD cash deposit rates for these three companies will remain at the rates set for each company in the most recently completed proceeding (i.e., the original final determination or a prior administrative review).
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on wooden bedroom furniture from China (A-570-890) (here). Commerce found seven companies did not demonstrate independence from state control, assigning all seven the China-wide AD duty rate of 216.01%. Commerce will assess AD duties at this rate on subject merchandise from these seven companies entered between Jan. 1, 2015, and Dec. 31, 2015. A 216.01% AD duty cash deposit rate for these seven companies takes effect Feb. 15.