The Bureau of Industry and Security shouldn’t renew the one-year authorizations it gave to certain foreign chip companies as part of its Oct. 7 China chip controls unless the agency makes “significant” changes to the restrictions when it finalizes the controls in the coming months, said Derek Scissors, a China policy expert with the American Enterprise Institute. Scissors said extending the licenses beyond their October expiration would “undermine” the Biden administration’s goal of denying China advanced semiconductor technology and unfairly advantage foreign companies over U.S. firms.
The Senate this week voted to attach amendments to its version of the FY 2024 National Defense Authorization Act, including one that could establish a notification regime for certain outbound investments and another that could ban China, Russia, North Korea and Iran from investing in American farmland and agricultural businesses.
The Bureau of Industry and Security will now require companies that report boycott requests to inform BIS of the “specific party who made the request,” Matthew Axelrod, the agency’s top export enforcement official, said in a July 26 policy memo to enforcement employees. Companies previously were only required to report to BIS that they received the boycott request and the “country from which the request originated,” the memo said. Information on the identity of the requester will allow BIS to “more easily investigate and hold accountable” parties engaging in a boycott.
The Bureau of Industry and Security this week signed an “agreement” with the Office of Foreign Assets Control to improve coordination among the two agencies’ export control and sanctions enforcement teams, said Matthew Axelrod, the top BIS export enforcement official. The agreement will help in “formalizing our close coordination and partnership,” Axelrod said during a July 26 Society for International Affairs conference, according to a copy of his speech emailed by BIS.
The U.S. this week issued new guidance on its various voluntary self-disclosure policies for sanctions and export control violations, urging companies to disclose offenses and stressing the importance of “robust” compliance programs. The six-page “compliance note,” the second jointly issued by the Commerce, Treasury and Justice departments (see 2303020054), outlines DOJ’s recently updated disclosure policies for criminal export and sanctions violations, the raft of changes made to the Bureau of Industry and Security's administrative enforcement policies over the past year, and the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s procedures for assessing voluntary disclosures. The notice also describes the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s whistleblower program.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo this week declined to say when she expects the Bureau of Industry and Security to finalize its Oct. 7 China chip controls (see 2210070049, saying it’s more important to her that the agency takes its time and gets the updated restrictions “right.” She also said she doesn’t see Chips Act funding and restrictions on American chips sales to China as contradictory and denied reports that the administration has delayed new export controls against China in an effort to limit damage to its relationship with Beijing.
U.S. policymakers should explore new ways to restrict transfers of items and services that China may be using to advance its artificial intelligence capabilities, such as data, algorithms and human capital, the Center for a New American Security said in a report this week. Although the administration should “aggressively” restrict exports to China of advanced semiconductor equipment, the report said Washington also needs to “seek out creative tools to regulate other basic building blocks of AI.”
A former U.S. trade representative and treasury secretary this week cautioned the Biden administration as it prepares to introduce a new outbound investment screening regime, saying new authorities like these tend to expand over time and could eventually be used beyond their intended purpose.
Increasing export control coordination between the U.S. and its trading partners is likely to result in an uptick in enforcement actions and lead to a range of compliance risks for multinational companies, law firms said this month. While much of the coordination so far has centered around Russia-related restrictions, the firms said they expect the efforts to also result in more export penalties for controls imposed against other countries.
Sanctions compliance officers working in the maritime shipping industry should pay particularly close attention to registered ship owners operating single-ship fleets, which could signal a ship attempting to evade sanctions, said Byron McKinney of S&P Global Market Intelligence. McKinney said he’s seen a spike in single-ship fleets -- which are used in some cases to obscure the true ownership of a vessel -- since the Treasury Department published its maritime sanctions advisory in 2020.