A Missouri bill clarifying that streaming content is exempted from paying video franchise fees cleared the House Utilities Committee on a 13-1 vote last week. The House could vote next on HB-2057. The South Carolina legislature approved a similar bill last week (see 2401250025).

A Washington state House panel voted 4-3 to clear a bill that seeks to share county 911 fee revenue with municipalities (see 2401160042). The Local Government Committee approved an amendment to HB-2258 that would effectively limit the bill’s scope to Spokane, the city where sponsor Rep. Timm Ormsby (D) last week said the bill was particularly needed. The panel’s three Republicans voted no. Ranking member Keith Goehner (R) said he worries the bill would set a precedent even with a limited scope.

Wisconsin's lower chamber supported prohibiting caller ID spoofing Thursday. On a voice vote, the Assembly concurred with the Senate-passed SB-531, while tabling the similar AB-559. The Senate bill still requires approval from Gov. Tony Evers (D). It would bar knowing transmission of misleading or inaccurate caller ID information through a call or text with intention to defraud or steal anything of value. Also, the bill would bar phone solicitors from blocking caller ID transmission. It would allow solicitors to transmit the name and phone number of the seller they represent, as well as authorized law enforcement activities. Violators could pay $100 to $10,000 penalties.

The South Carolina House passed a bill clarifying that satellite TV and streaming video fall outside cable franchise fees. Lawmakers in the lower chamber voted 115-0 Wednesday to concur with Senate amendments to H-3782. The Senate approved it last week (see 2401190021). The bill next needs a signature from Gov. Henry McMaster (R).

Florida House members unanimously approved a bill requiring age verification for pornography websites. Lawmakers voted 119-0 Wednesday to send HB-3 to the Senate. House members supported the bill in committee hearings (see 2401170061 and 2401110044). Earlier Wednesday, Florida's House passed a bill (HB-1) restricting children younger than 16 from using social media regardless of parental consent (see 2401240079). The Computer & Communications Industry Association condemned HB-1 after the vote. “Legislation like this violates federal law and positions the government to block access to legal information online -- a Constitutional right even younger users do have,” said CCIA State Policy Director Khara Boender.

West Virginia will suspend its telecom relay service (TRS) fee on customer bills, effective May 1, the Public Service Commission decided Wednesday. “The fund is generating adequate revenue to pay the monthly charges incurred by TRS users,” the PSC order said. “It is unlikely the fund will be exhausted in the foreseeable future.” PSC staff said last week that West Virginia could fund relay services for 20 years even if it reduced the TRS fee to zero (see 2401190013).

Indiana lawmakers may address social media legislation next year, Senate Commerce Committee members said at a livestreamed hearing Thursday. The panel heard testimony but didn’t vote on SB-201, which would require that social media companies verify a user's age and obtain parental consent before a minor can open accounts. Also, the bill would require smartphone makers to activate content filters by default for minors. Sponsor Sen. Spencer Deery (R) hopes to continue the conversation and “find something that we can come back next year with … that will enter Indiana into this space,” he said as the hearing wrapped. Likewise, Committee Chair Brian Buchanan (R) said “this is something I want to continue discussion on and possibly bring back next year.” Buchanan seeks a balance between keeping kids safe and maintaining parental rights, he said. Content filter mandates and social media restrictions for minors are unconstitutional, Edward Longe, director-technology and innovation for free-market think tank James Madison Institute, argued. "Content filters represent a one-size-fits-all government solution to a problem that has already been resolved by the market,” he said. “There is no age restriction to the First Amendment.” Rather than restrict minors, it’s better to require online media literacy training, as in a 2023 Florida law, he told the committee. Longe didn’t mention that Florida House members Wednesday passed a bill restricting children younger than 16 from using social media regardless of parental consent (see 2401240079). Deery doesn’t want Indiana to ban kids from social media but rather give parents power to consent, said the Republican: Literacy training alone won’t cut it. The Computer & Communications Industry Association opposed SB-201 in written testimony. “While CCIA strongly supports the overall goal of keeping children safe online, requiring a state-specific default filter is technologically infeasible and would create unobtainable expectations with regard to content that filters can reasonably block.”

South Dakota could increase a 911 fee on monthly phone bllls to $2, from $1.25. The House Taxation Committee voted 9-4 for HB-1092 on Tuesday. The bill would clarify that revenue from the fee “must” be used for 911.

The Florida House supported removing kids younger than 16 from social media platforms in a 106-13 bipartisan vote Wednesday. Lawmakers approved HB-1 one day after rejecting an amendment that would have allowed parents to choose whether their children may use social media (see 2401230078). The bill now goes to the Senate. If the upper chamber approves it and Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signs it, social media companies would need to terminate kids’ accounts July 1. "These companies know what they are doing is wrong,” said sponsor Rep. Tyler Sirois (R). “They have not acted … In Florida, we will.” The state government must step in to protect children from online threats, bullying and crime, agreed co-sponsor Rep. Fiona McFarland (R): Companies won’t self-police and the federal government isn’t acting. Most of the House’s 36 Democrats voted for HB-1, though several raised concerns in floor debate. Judiciary Committee ranking member Michael Gottlieb (D) doesn't oppose regulating social media but dislikes HB-1’s “very broad brush,” he said. "What we're saying is essentially that kids don't have the right to assemble," which the First Amendment protects. "When we take that from somebody" it must be through the "least restrictive means,” said Gottlieb. Rep. Daryl Campbell (D) said the bill’s intent “sounds good,” but it’s “complete governmental overreach” to tell parents they’re not fit to make the best decision for their children. Saying the bill is unconstitutional, Rep. Ashley Gantt (D) asked when Florida will stop telling parents that lawmakers know better. But Democrat Rep. Michele Rayner asked how lawmakers can tell parents that the First Amendment is more important than their child’s life. Rep. Kevin Chambless (D) said that "for every success story" on social media, there is "a negative story of exploitation." Rep. Katherine Waldron (D) said that while HB-1 “may not be popular among those 16 or under -- or perhaps among some parents -- the positives will far outweigh the negatives.”

The Washington state House Innovation Committee heard testimony Tuesday on broadband legislation, HB 2313. The bill assigns additional duties to the state Office of Equity, said Emily Pool, a committee staffer. The office “is tasked with continuing to develop and also maintain the state equity plan, and the office must also undertake the outreach effort” being conducted by the Statewide Broadband Office, Pool said. This includes assisting consumers and enrolling them in broadband and digital equity programs, she said. Rep. Mia Gregerson (D), who sponsored the bill, said she was focused on digital equity since before the COVID-19 pandemic. The bill updates the state’s initial broadband equity act, Gregerson said. “With anything as big as this you always really need to come back and have that time to understand what has happened" and “how far have we come forward,” she said. Most testimony supported approval of the legislation.