The FCC Office of Engineering and Technology seeks comment on its measurements of LTE interference with DTV receivers, said an OET public notice Friday (http://bit.ly/1nYA43l). OET wants comment on whether its measurements support conclusions about interservice interference, including that LTE interference with DTV stations will appear “nearly identical” to interference from other DTV stations. OET wants comment on the relevance of measurements associated with two outdated receiver models, it said. “OET anticipates that these receivers will no longer be commercially available and will be approaching the end of their useful lifecycle at the time of the wireless build out in the 600 MHz Band.” Comments are due July 11.

The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) was sharply critical of FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler’s proposed changes to the federal E-rate program, unveiled Friday (CD June 23 p4). ISTE CEO Brian Lewis called the plan a “step backward” for the program. The proposal “envisions” a five-year program with $1 billion per year dedicated to build-out of wireless connectivity within schools and libraries, but it identified only two years of the funding needed “and no guarantee of more dollars after that,” Lewis said in a news release. “Let’s stop rearranging the deckchairs,” he said. “Let’s invest the funding that even the Commission knows the E-Rate needs to fully equip our students, educators and library patrons with the bandwidth necessary for improved education, employment and citizenship.” ISTE’s membership is made up of teachers. The proposal also had supporters. Bob Wise, president of the Alliance for Excellent Education and former governor of West Virginia, said Wheeler is on the right track. “No modern business expects to function without access to high-speed Internet,” he said in a written statement. “So why should we expect it of our schools?”

Political pressure stirred up by the FCC net neutrality proceeding could lead to “negative spillover” for Comcast’s planned buy of Time Warner Cable, said Guggenheim Partners analyst Paul Gallant in an email to investors Friday. That could lead to harsher deal conditions or an FCC challenge to the transaction, Gallant said. “We don’t believe that is the most likely outcome, but it is more likely today than it was five weeks ago when the FCC issued its net neutrality proposal.” Regulatory approval of AT&T/DirecTV is likely, “but not highly likely,” Gallant said. AT&T’s deal concessions seem “well-designed” to address concerns about pay-TV pricing and expand broadband availability, Gallant said. If Sprint and T-Mobile were to agree to combine and seek regulatory approval, it would likely be the first telecom deal to take the Department of Justice to court for not approving it, Gallant said. “Sprint/T-Mobile would actually have a decent chance of beating DOJ.” Such a win could then cause the FCC to approve the deal, he said. “It’s definitely still an uphill battle, but not the hopeless case some believe.” On peering, Gallant said it’s unlikely that the FCC would ban paid peering fees by Netflix and content delivery networks. Most investors don’t see Title II reclassification of broadband as likely to happen, Gallant said. But unlike the last net neutrality rulemaking process, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit’s Verizon decision narrows the other options available to the FCC, Gallant said. “We are thinking the movie ends well for ISPs this time as well, but right now we're not as confident as most investors we spoke with.” On the upcoming Aereo decision, Gallant said only a “complete victory” for broadcasting would be viewed as a positive for broadcasters. Other outcomes, such as a remand back to lower courts, are “likely to be read as at least mildly negative for broadcasters,” he said.

The FCC should designate a portion of its E-rate “down payment” to Priority 1 services, while it designates a large portion for Priority 2 services, the American Library Association told a Wireline Bureau official Thursday, an ex parte filing in docket 10-90 said Friday (http://bit.ly/1iQzJLM). In any future funding models, current Priority 1 services need to continue to be fully funded, ALA said. Priority 1 services, currently funded first, deal with telecom services and Internet access to a school or library building; Priority 2 focuses on internal connections. The commission should also review rules that may prohibit school-library partnerships in securing high-capacity broadband, ALA said.

Compelled disclosure of Internet interconnection agreements creates “anticompetitive risks,” said a paper by the Free State Foundation (http://bit.ly/1lSLuBo). The FCC’s recent announcement that the agency has requested copies of the agreements that Netflix has with ISPs Comcast and Verizon “has renewed calls for the Commission to make these agreements public,” wrote Boston College Associate Law Professor Daniel Lyons, a member of FSF’s board of academic advisers. “While transparency is often a laudatory policy goal,” proposals that all network interconnection agreements be filed with the commission and open to public inspection “is misguided and may ultimately harm the very competition that proponents seek to protect,” the paper said. The net neutrality rules requiring ISPs to disclose the terms upon which they sell broadband access to consumers are “very different from mandating detailed disclosure of specific, confidential business-to-business agreements negotiated between sophisticated parties in a highly competitive interconnection market,” said the paper, released Thursday. “It is a basic tenet of economic and industrial organization literature that sharing competitively sensitive information among rivals can facilitate tacit collusion."

Set-top boxes are responsible for “just 1.3 percent of a typical household’s energy use,” NCTA said in blog post Thursday (http://bit.ly/UifNf4), responding to a recent Los Angeles Times article’s comparison of set-top energy use to a washing machine. A recent industry voluntary agreement on set-top energy use (CD Dec 24 p1) means the devices are improving faster in energy use than a Department of Energy proposed standard would have, NCTA said. Users can check set-top energy use for themselves (http://bit.ly/1iLOobc) by taking advantage of transparency requirements in the voluntary agreement, NCTA said. The L.A. Times article is “incredibly misleading” said NCTA. The L.A. Times stands by the story, its author, Ralph Vartabedian, told us in an email. With multiple set-top boxes to serve multiple TVs, the boxes can be the largest use of power apart from air conditioning, he said. He also disputed NCTA criticisms that the story equates set-top box energy use with a washing machine’s. “We never said the box consumes that much power. In fact, the very next sentence in the story says these [boxes] consume 35 watts continuously,” Vartabedian said. “We checked with other private and government energy organizations and they concurred with our research and say our story is accurate.”

Correction: All platforms do not have the technology to generate enhanced 911 location information, an FCC advisory group was told by Laurie Flaherty, coordinator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s National 911 program (CD June 19 p2).

It’s time for the FCC to “take a look under the hood and learn whether Internet traffic exchange issues are putting up a barrier to continued innovation and investment on the Internet,” said a blog post Wednesday by Office of Engineering and Technology Chief Engineer Julie Knapp and Walter Johnston, chief of OET’s Electromagnetic Compatibility Division (http://fcc.us/1uH08km). The post cited recent disputes between Netflix, Cogent and ISPs like Comcast and Verizon as an example of the problems facing consumers. The FCC Measuring Broadband America report (CD June 19 p7) provided evidence that “there are problems here worth examining,” the post said, citing “notable anomalies” as it collected speed data, with “significant drops in broadband performance” during a period when Cogent reported disputes with various ISPs. “We need to understand better what is going on,” the post said. The agency has released the “full raw data set” to the public so others can analyze the findings, and is “taking a deeper look into causes of congestion” including “analyzing network impact on video service providers such as YouTube, Hulu, and Netflix,” the post said. By winter, the agency hopes to have instituted more testing methodologies that will provide more information on network congestion and peering, it said

AT&T’s deal to purchase DirecTV is “pretty clean,” with “not a lot of complications” for the FCC to approve, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President for External and Legislative Affairs Jim Cicconi told Wells Fargo analysts, according to an email from the bank to investors Wednesday. AT&T will participate in the broadcast incentive auction and the AWS-3 auction, and will add at least 20 MHz between the two, the email said. Verizon sees the AWS-3 auction as a “top priority,” Wells Fargo said. Valuation in that auction could “top $1.50 per MHz/Pop,” the email said, though the analysts don’t know how much AT&T or Verizon will spend in the auction. Broadcaster participation in the incentive auction is the FCC’s “primary concern” about the proceeding, Wells Fargo said. The commission is less concerned about the auction starting on a specific date than it is about it being successful, the analysts said. There is debate in the industry about whether it will be possible to give broadcaster clarity on pricing in advance of the auction, Wells Fargo said. “If AWS3 proceeds fully cover the cost of FirstNet, the FCC could be more aggressive in compensating broadcasters’ participation.” The commission is also preparing to begin its broadcaster outreach efforts, the email said.

A computational study submitted to the FCC by AT&T explores questions about how many broadcasters must participate in a given market for the agency to hit various targets for clearing spectrum for resale to carriers and also identifies pressure points. The news is mostly good, AT&T said. The study found that some 200 broadcasters must voluntarily give up spectrum to hit a target of 84 MHz of spectrum being made available for auction without “domain constraints” identified by the FCC, with 250 exits needed if these constraints are taken into account. A domain constraint means that one broadcaster cannot be assigned to a given channel, mostly because of treaties with Canada and Mexico, which forbid U.S. stations from being assigned to channels where they would interfere with stations across the border, the report explained (http://bit.ly/1ng4WJq). It’s by Michael Kearns and Lili Dworkin of the University of Pennsylvania. “As important and interesting as these questions are, to date scant analysis on these questions has been offered,” said AT&T Vice President-Federal Regulatory Joan Marsh in a Wednesday blog post (http://bit.ly/1iaiRoz). There are few “black and white” answers, Marsh wrote. “For any clearing target, there are almost unlimited variations on possible broadcaster participation and a very large number of possible repacking solutions. But from the research, an outline of the scope of the possible begins to emerge.” The report also found that some surprising markets will likely be among the most challenging to clear. It said Milwaukee is on the list because of its closeness to the congested Chicago market, and North Carolina and South Carolina because they are tied into the “challenging East Coast daisy chain.” Challenges presented by the auction “are without a doubt significant,” but the analysis demonstrates that “as long as the financial incentives are attractive, a successful outcome is well within reach,” Marsh wrote. AT&T officials including Marsh explained the findings in a meeting last week with Gary Epstein, chairman of the Incentive Auction Task Force; Julius Knapp, chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology; and other FCC officials, said a Tuesday filing in docket 12-268 (http://bit.ly/1nPJQom). AT&T should be commended for taking on such a complex topic, and the results “reaffirm” past filings by broadcasters, NAB Executive Vice President Rick Kaplan told us. “It also sheds light into some of technical fundamentals and rudimentary questions that are necessary to help craft a first-rate auction and repacking process. NAB continues to work with all interested and affected industries to enhance the proposed FCC auction and repacking modeling.” The domain constraints include some issues like those concerning borders “that maybe can be negotiated away,” said Preston Padden, executive director of the Expanding Opportunities for Broadcasters Coalition. “But it also includes constraints that cannot be made to go away like the five UHF public safety channels in New York City.”