Correction: The U.S. libraries for which an L-rate program would be designed are the 17,000 not connected to schools, said Urban Libraries Council representative Reed Hundt (CD April 9 p8).

Neustar asked the FCC to formally seek public comment before selecting the Local Number Portability Administrator (LNPA) for the contract period scheduled to begin July 2015. “Notice and comment is required,” Neustar said in a letter to the commission Tuesday (http://bit.ly/PNL1s8). “Where the Commission has designated an entity to serve as a neutral numbering administrator ... based on a [North American Numbering Council] recommendation, it has acted after providing notice and seeking public comment,” Neustar said. “Because the selection process at issue will lead to the designation of a neutral LNP administrator, notice and comment is required here as well.” The notice seeking comment on NANC’s proposed recommendation should “specifically request comment on the significant issues that have been framed,” said Neustar. It said that would include whether the extension of the deadline for submission of proposals in April 2013 -- after the original deadline had come and gone -- “was lawful and appropriate.” The agency should also rule on whether the failure to seek further proposals in January was in the public interest, and whether the evaluation carried out pursuant to the request for proposal documents “constituted an ‘apples-to-apples’ comparison of competing bids,” said Neustar, the current LNPA contract holder. Another big question: “Whether the deficiencies in the process to date require that no award be made now and an additional round of bidding be held,” Neustar said. Given the “extraordinary ramifications” of the LNPA selection, the commission should address outstanding issues at the commission level, Neustar said. NANC met last week privately to consider whether to recommend the FCC renew Neustar’s contract or give it to rival bidders (CD March 26 p7).

Corrections: What Computer and Communications Industry Association Vice President-Government Relations Cathy Sloan said she hopes happens this month on the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act (S-1720) is a committee markup (CD April 8 p13) … “SG32” is the ATSC specialist group that’s working to complete ATSC 3.0’s physical layer (CD April 8 p11).

It’s not about the dollars that consumers will spend on Ultra HD TVs, “it’s about the eyeballs” that will mark the needed “critical mass” before a broadcaster jumps in with an ad-supported TV network dedicated to 4K programming, Vince Roberts, Disney-ABC TV Networks chief technology officer, said Monday in a “super session” conference on consumers, 4K and next-generation home entertainment at the NAB Show. “To hit that critical mass if one were to launch a 4K network that could be relatively well-supported by the ad industry, it’s probably around 40 million homes that would make it practical for you to be able to sell ads,” Roberts said. “So there needs to be a tremendous amount of penetration in that space for any of us on the programming side to begin considering launching a full-time, 24-by-7 network doing specifically UHD. That doesn’t scale very well unless you hit that level of critical mass.” Roberts agrees with those who see “more of the niche” players leading the way with 4K TV programming, he said. “It’s going to be what Netflix is doing. It’s going to be VOD, that kind of unique user experience that can deliver that high-quality content.” He said he has heard that some multichannel video programming distributors “are talking about launching full-time UHD channels, and DirecTV has made some movements in that direction, so we'll wait and see.” If it turns out “that the right business opportunity is there, then content will be created or provisioned for those platforms,” Roberts said. But Disney-ABC TV has no “immediate plans right now to put a full-time network together” on 4K, he said. “That’s pretty far off in the future for us."

The Supreme Court shot down Freedom Watch founder Larry Klayman’s attempt to get the high court to review the Klayman v. Obama phone surveillance case he has been involved in over the past several months (http://1.usa.gov/1srZ71s). The case began in June in the U.S. District Court, Washington, D.C., and Klayman received a favorable verdict in December from Judge Richard Leon, which the federal government appealed. Klayman sought to expand and certify the case in a March 25 filing before Leon, asking for immediate Supreme Court review.

FCC targeted outreach to broadcasters in advance of the TV incentive auction would go too far and risk making participation seem less than voluntary, the Television Licensee Coalition (TLC) said in a letter to the FCC. “The FCC has quite properly embarked on a process of generally educating TV stations about this opportunity by means of FCC webinars, workshops, conferences, etc., open to all interested parties, as well as the FCC LEARN program on the FCC website,” the TLC said. “But with its recent announcement of plans to conduct Targeted Outreach, the Commission risks tipping the delicate balance it is required to effectuate between a truly ‘voluntary’ auction and one in which the government, by overreaching, undermines that statutory dictate.” The auction is supposed to be voluntary, TLC said: “TLC respectfully suggests that the FCC resist taking any action that might be interpreted as instead introducing an element of compulsion into the process.” The group, represented by law firm Lerman Senter, speaks for “fifteen companies, licensed to operate approximately 300 full power television stations,” though the companies remain anonymous, the filing said (http://bit.ly/1jonSqo).

Build-out requirements for spectrum licenses have been only somewhat successful, said David Redl, chief counsel for the House Communications Subcommittee, at a Silicon Flatirons conference Thursday on “Property Rights in Spectrum, Water, and Minerals.” Build-out requirements have long been a fact of life for broadcasters, Redl said. “In Washington when we're looking at the policy, we don’t want to blindly adhere to use it or lose it policy,” he said. “When applied rationally, a use it or lose policy can work really well, but unlike minerals, for example, where there’s a finite amount of ore in a given place, spectrum … if you don’t use it in this time parameter, it’s gone and you have to move on.” Redl cited the 2.3 GHz band, where major interference issues surfaced between Wireless Communications Service licensees and satellite-TV operations. “Building that out … to use it so you don’t lose it wouldn’t make much sense if once the interference parameters got cleaned up, you would have had to go back and reinvest again,” he said. Phil Weiser, dean of the University of Colorado Law School, said use it or lose requirements have worked well for mineral rights, are viewed with skepticism in water and are usually “an afterthought” for spectrum licenses. “You hear the word build-out requirements in spectrum … if you don’t build out to serve an entire area, then you lose some spectrum,” he said. He agreed with Redl that the requirements have been a “mixed bag” in wireless. Spectrum is just different than water and minerals, Redl said. “Spectrum is infinitely renewable across the time domain,” he said. “Every second, the entire spectrum is made re-available.” Another difference is that the same spectrum can be shared, Weiser said. “You can actually have compatible use in the same time and the same place if people are not using power levels that create interference,” he said. “You could have a system operating that is of high power and then a very lower power system that could come in even potentially without a licenses and use what you might call an underlay portion of the spectrum.”

Correction: The meeting when the FCC 3.5 GHz rulemaking is expected to get a vote is on April 23(CD April 3 p1).

Small- and mid-sized telecom operators provide broadband in rural areas, competition and choice in urban areas, and services to community institutions and businesses in underserved areas, the American Cable Association said in a white paper (http://bit.ly/1mL3L9s). The study, released Wednesday, was done by Cartesian. ACA members’ broadband footprint covers nearly 8 million homes in small cities and rural areas, “covering nearly 20 percent of the population in these areas,” it said. But ACA members face specific challenges due to their size, it said. Local and regional cable operators “must compete against large telephone companies receiving government subsidies to provide broadband to unserved areas.” They also are disadvantaged in negotiations over interconnection with the networks of Tier 1 Internet service providers, it said. ACA estimates that 1.6 million homes in its members’ territories are considered “high cost,” it said. Of these homes, about 842,000 would be eligible to receive government broadband funding “if not for the presence of ACA members,” it said.

End all bulk collection of data about individuals, said 44 organizations in a letter to the White House and congressional leaders (http://bit.ly/1s3nUbM). “We strongly urge swift markup and passage of the USA FREEDOM Act (HR-3361), which would enact appropriate surveillance reforms without sacrificing national security.” Monday’s letter was to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and the chairmen and ranking members of the Senate and House Judiciary and Intelligence committees. Attorney General Eric Holder also received a copy. Organizations ranging from privacy advocates (including the Center for Democracy and Technology, Cyber Privacy Project, Electronic Frontier Foundation) to civil liberties advocates (such as American Civil Liberties Union, Brennan Center for Justice, Human Rights Watch) and technology companies (like Reddit) signed the letter. The groups urged the recipients to not focus legislation simply on Patriot Act Section, which applies to the “bulk collection of any records that reveal relationships between individuals.” Bulk collection should also be prohibited under Section 214, which the NSA has used to authorize bulk collection of Internet metadata through pen/trap authority, said the groups. “The USA FREEDOM Act addresses each of these reforms, as well as others, by aiming to prohibit bulk collection of all data under Section 215 and 214.” The White House has backed a proposal shifting bulk storage of metadata away from the government, instead looking to the phone companies to hold on to any necessary metadata (CD March 28 p10).