ORLANDO - The plan recently submitted to the FCC by the Intercarrier Compensation Forum (ICF) was criticized by some at the Comptel/ASCENT conference here for not addressing VoIP. “The plan should address all the types of traffic,” said KMC Telecom Vp & Senior Counsel- Regulatory Affairs Marva Johnson: “I believe we need to move towards a SIP-based interconnection and the plan should account for it… Any plan that doesn’t incorporate VoIP traffic won’t be sustainable in the future… Not to incorporate that is a severe flaw.”
The Universal Service Administrative Co.’s (USAC’s) outside board members are trying to get a legislative fix to solve an accounting problem (CD Oct 6 p1) that caused the $6.5 billion universal service program to lose money and jeopardized not only to the E-rate program but also high-cost rural telephony support. Although USAC can’t lobby Congress, its board has been meeting with state regulators, telecom industry associations, education groups and others to seek help in gaining legislation during the lame-duck session of Congress beginning Nov. 15. “The USAC board is reaching out to constituents, talking to people about a solution, trying to do as much as we can,” said USAC Chmn. Frank Gumper, a Verizon consultant: “We've got to do something to get the situation under control, to get the program back to normal.”
The Internet Innovation Alliance (IIA) officially kicked off Mon., as its leaders said “promoting VoIP services” and “educating people” were top goals of the new group. Unlike other VoIP organizations, such as the VON Coalition, the IIA will focus primarily on regulatory and economic rather than social policy VoIP issues, its leaders said.
VoIP providers are forming the Global IP Alliance to demonstrate to state, national and international regulators that the industry is capable of self-governance. The alliance, expected to be formally announced in the next several weeks, will be led by Pulver.com and consist of ILECs, CLECs, IXCs and pure VoIP providers from around the world. “We want to make sure we represent all points of view globally,” said Pulver.com Gen. Counsel Jonathan Askin, who will be exec. dir. of the alliance. He said the group has attracted “a lot of” U.S. VoIP providers and “a couple of” European ones, but he said “we need to get more Asian” companies. The initial members will include SBC, Global Crossing, Skype, KMC, Volo and Pulver.com.
One of the few surprises at Wed.’s FCC mostly well scripted meeting was a strong statement from Comr. Copps warning that the FCC is still falling short on homeland security. Shortly after the session’s start, Copps -- responding to an FCC report on post-Sept. 11 communications changes that led off a meeting largely focused on homeland security -- addressed at length Commission shortcomings. Sources involved with emergency communications said Thurs. that issues remain, echoing in part Copps’ statements. Copps, sources said, delivered what he viewed as a moderate speech.
The Senate Commerce Committee approved several pieces of legislation Thurs. -- including VoIP, satellite home viewer improvement act (SHVIA), low power FM radio, junk fax and reauthorization of the Corp. for Public Bcstg. (CPB) -- but fighting over an FTC nominee brought an abrupt end to the markup, which could have prevented some amendments from being introduced. Sen. Wyden (D-Ore.) infuriated Committee Chmn. McCain (R-Ariz.) by invoking the “2-hour rule” which prevents committee meetings from lasting more than 2 hours when the Senate is in session. Wyden was battling McCain on procedures concerning Deborah Majoras, the nominee for FTC Chmn. Wyden opposed the nomination over disagreements with FTC action on gasoline prices. Sources said potential amendments to junk fax and CPB legislation couldn’t be offered after Wyden’s procedural move. The Committee had approved the 2 bills under unanimous consent with the understanding they could be amended later in the markup.
Supported by at least 2 Bell companies, USTA urged the FCC in comments to leave the IP-enabled services market free of economic regulation. But some consumer groups argued the Commission should subject VoIP to Title II regulation to protect consumers, and use its authority to exempt such services from unnecessary regulations. The Local Govt. Coalition reminded the FCC it had “no power to adopt a comprehensive scheme for regulating information services independent of Title II, Title III or Title VI” of the Communications Act. Meanwhile, states pressed for a technology-neutral functional approach to VoIP oversight. “Regulators should not be choosing technology winners and losers,” NARUC Gen. Counsel Brad Ramsay told us. More comments were expected after our deadline Fri.
Year-long talks aimed at working out an agreement on access charges through the Intercarrier Compensation Forum (ICF) have collapsed for now, with the formal departure Wed. of several key members -- including BellSouth, which initiated discussions with AT&T last year. Many of the discussions had been at BellSouth’s Washington office.
Even if it’s VoIP, telecom is “an essential public service” and local govts. will want to make sure reliable service is available to the public, said Marilyn Showalter, chmn. of the Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission. NATOA Pres. Coralie Wilson said govts. “simply cannot let technical standards lapse” just because of VoIP: “We need assurance the network will continue to operate.” Speaking on the same local govt. panel here, Neb. PSC Comr. Anne Boyle said “consumer protection goes beyond CALEA and E911.” She said VoIP providers need to comply with best practices, as well as with good customer service, and consumers are “who the government is there to protect.” At a later panel of FCC bureau chiefs, Wilson raised the question of mandating technical standards for new telecom services. He got little response, other than from Robert Pepper, FCC chief of policy development. Pepper indicated only that the Network Reliability & Interoperability Council would deal with such issues, and that the diversification of telecom into wireless and IP-based services increases diversity of the overall network. Local govt. officials spent much of their time talking about how to assure Universal Service Fund (USF) funding with the arrival of new technologies. Cal. PUC Comr. Susan Kennedy endorsed a per-number USF fee. Showalter agreed that’s probably “pretty reasonable,” though she said in the long term telephone numbers won’t be needed. Fla. PSC Comr. Charles Davidson, however, said USF “needs a business plan… It shouldn’t be a program that just expands and becomes a new tax.” Showalter suggested broadband will be necessary in the future and if people can’t afford it “government must assure that it gets there.” Kennedy, however, said Internet and video services “clearly” don’t qualify for USF. -- MF
A variety of consumer groups launched a campaign Thurs. to work for retention of the revenue-based Universal Service Fund (USF) collection system. The Keep Universal Service Fair Coalition, made up of senior, disability, consumer, minority and rural organizations, said moving to a flat, connections-based system would harm consumers and low-volume users. Connections-based systems would collect money through a subscriber line or per-user fee, which would mean low- volume users would “pay the same amount in USF fees as high- volume users.” The coalition includes 12 organizations such as the Alliance for Public Technology, Alliance for Retired Americans, American Assn. of People with Disabilities, Black Leadership Forum, Gray Panthers.