Clyburn said increasing access to high-speed Internet is especially important in poorer areas, because quick Internet can compensate for a lack of other resources. “Broadband is a great equalizer for a whole host of people,” said Clyburn. She provided an example of a school in a low-income area using the Internet to connect students with a foreign language teacher for instruction the school could otherwise not afford. “At the click of mouse you can transport yourself to another country,” said Clyburn.
Monty Tayloe
Monty Tayloe, Associate Editor, covers broadcasting and the Federal Communications Commission for Communications Daily. He joined Warren Communications News in 2013, after spending 10 years covering crime and local politics for Virginia regional newspapers and a turn in television as a communications assistant for the PBS NewsHour. He’s a Virginia native who graduated Fork Union Military Academy and the College of William and Mary. You can follow Tayloe on Twitter: @MontyTayloe .
Charter Communications fired back at requests by TiVo and CEA that the FCC Media Bureau reconsider a waiver of CableCARD rules granted to the cable operator in April (CD April 22 p3). In separate ex parte letters filed Tuesday (http://bit.ly/14wR1Wj and http://bit.ly/10Qxbb4), Charter said TiVo and CEA arguments that the waiver doesn’t require it to support CableCARDs are “premised on a mistaken understanding” of the commission’s rules and the impact of the January EchoStar decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (http://bit.ly/10nMM3E).
Officials from Time Warner Cable, Verizon and Public Knowledge agreed the FCC should not go back to enforcing net neutrality rules under Title II of the Communications Act if Verizon wins its appeal of the commission’s net neutrality order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. A Verizon win is likely, said Time Warner Cable Chief Government Relations Officer Gail MacKinnon. “That is what’s widely believed,” she said at a Free State Foundation luncheon Tuesday on what policies the next FCC chairman should pursue. “Title II should be a last resort,” said Public Knowledge President Gigi Sohn. “A more narrow fix would be better” than what some consider “the nuclear option” of Title II, she said.
CEA and NCTA have asked the Department of Energy to pause a rulemaking process on energy standards for set-top boxes and instead allow multichannel video program distributors to police themselves, the trade groups said at a joint media briefing Monday. Davis Wright attorney Paul Glist, representing NCTA, said he believes DOE proposals (CD April 10 p19) on whether set-top boxes should be regulated and how they should be tested could be finalized soon. If so, they would be a “switch point” for the cable industry, he said. If the DOE continues with the rulemaking, it will invalidate a voluntary agreement (VA) on set-top box standards that’s already being followed industry-wide, and discourage other industries from working proactively on energy efficiency, “undermining the very thing the DOE wants to encourage,” he said. DOE and the National Resources Defense Council, which backed tighter standards on set-top boxes, didn’t comment.
The FCC will make information on the incentive auction repacking available for “meaningful comment” this summer, said Assistant Wireless Bureau Chief Brett Tarnutzer. At an FCBA panel Thursday, he discussed several issues associated with the auction, including the recent public notice on the 600 MHz band plan and the commission’s reliance on TVStudy software to run the auction. Despite the complications inherent in the auction, the commission still believes it’s on track to release a report and order on it this year, and hold the auction in 2014, said Tarnutzer. “I believe we can do this."
The FCC released an NPRM on accessibility for user interfaces and video programming guides, implementing Sections 204 and 205 of the 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act (http://bit.ly/19qAKaI). As expected (CD May 1 p6), the NPRM released Friday proposed that Section 205, which governs video program guides for “navigation devices,” would apply to devices from multichannel video programming distributors, while Section 204, which governs user interfaces, would apply more broadly to other electronics that display or receive video.
Media cross-ownership has a “negligible” impact on minority and women broadcast ownership, said a Minority and Media Telecommunications Council Study submitted to the FCC Thursday (http://bit.ly/178iVhE). The commission delayed a vote on media ownership rules in February (CD Feb 27 p1) anticipation of the study’s completion. Several communications attorneys told us Thursday that even with the study done, it’s unlikely a vote will occur with a depleted commission and an acting chairwoman. Although MMTC President David Honig said the study satisfies a directive from 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to study the effects of cross-ownership rules, Free Press attacked the study for not being quantitative enough.
A week after being sued in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., online TV service FilmOn.com will stop streaming major broadcasters in D.C. and eventually all over the country, said an open letter sent to U.S. broadcasters by CEO Alki David. Doing business until now as Aereokiller, David’s company continues to call itself FilmOn.com after a recent legal settlement with competing company Aereo. David said FilmOn will replace the local network affiliates, the content of which it’s been streaming online, with independent stations, with which his company will negotiate residual fees. “This model will set a standard by which companies like Aereo will have a tougher time establishing the precedent of not paying broadcasters for the content that they own,” wrote David. Fox, CBS, ABC and NBC didn’t comment.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the FCC can’t force Comcast to carry the Tennis Channel on the same tier as the operator’s own Golf Channel and NBC Sports, in a 3-0 ruling Tuesday (http://1.usa.gov/12gefp0). In an opinion that communications attorneys said could affect other FCC carriage conflicts, the judges said the agency failed to show unlawful discrimination, or present evidence to refute “Comcast’s contention that its rejection of Tennis’s proposal was simply ‘a straight up financial analysis.'” Judges were skeptical of the FCC’s case during oral argument, with some courtroom observers predicting the cable operator would win the case (CD Feb 26 p1). The channel said it will appeal, while FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai cheered the ruling, as did Robert McDowell, who left the commission earlier this month and had voted against the agency’s order siding with the programmer over Comcast.
Several major broadcasters sued online TV service Aereokiller in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, and requested a preliminary injunction barring the company from rebroadcasting Washington-area TV stations. The lawsuit is the latest in an ongoing battle between broadcasters and Aereokiller and competing service Aereo, which both use networks of tiny individual antennas to rebroadcast TV stations’ content. “A court in California has already enjoined Aereokiller from operating in nine western states, in the process recognizing that the commercial retransmission of our broadcasts without permission or compensation is a clear violation of the law and congressional intent,” said ABC, NBC, Fox and Allbritton Communications in a joint statement. “We believe that the DC court will uphold our copyright interests and further restrict Aereokiller’s operations.” Aereokiller did not comment.