Twitter defended its decision to block the Free State Foundation from promoting a net neutrality tweet. “Don't Regulate the Internet as a Public Utility! Public utility regulation would be harmful and counterproductive, suppressing investment and innovation,” the tweet said. Promotion of the tweet was rejected because it was identified as political, a spokesperson wrote us Monday: “Twitter globally prohibits the promotion of political content defined as content that references a candidate, political party, elected or appointed government official, election, referendum, ballot measure, legislation, regulation, directive, or judicial outcome.” Free State Foundation said Twitter “claims to be for Net Neutrality -- but not when a view is expressed contrary to their views on Net Neutrality! Can you believe it was rejected?”
CTIA and USTelecom petitioned the FCC for regulatory relief on pro forma filings. The paperwork is routine and includes a company assigning a license authorization from one wholly owned subsidiary to another, said the Friday petition. “There remains a patchwork of similar but not identical requirements, procedures, and deadlines that vary by license type and reviewing Commission bureau,” the groups said: “A single non-substantial internal transaction can require a Commission licensee to file dozens or even hundreds of notifications for the same event. These filings can be numerous and complex, administratively burdensome, and do not further the public interest. They can strain resources for license holders who often have very few licenses, such as those used for two-way radio and other limited, internal communications.”
The FCC Wireless Bureau is seeking comment on the preliminary lump sum categories and payment amounts for fixed satellite service (FSS) incumbent earth station operators in the C-band transition, said a public notice Thursday. Comments will be due seven days after Federal Register publication. Telesat in a docket 18-122 posting Thursday said delaying the C-band transition plan deadline could have "collateral consequences" such as hindering the work to be done by the relocation coordinator. It said what the FCC has said about reimbursable costs "still [needs] to be fleshed out" but is enough for putting together a transition plan by the June 12 deadline. NCTA said the FCC needs to make sure MVPDs and content companies have a voice in encoding and modulation decisions and transition implementation. It said the cost catalog should be amended to reflect such decisions aren't satellite operators' alone.
The U.S. C-band auction appears on track for a December start, but other auctions globally are being delayed by COVID-19, satellite spectrum officials said in a webinar Thursday. There will be mobile interest in parts of the C band for international mobile telecom (IMT) at the 2023 World Radiocommunication Conference, but the big spectrum struggle could be between the mobile industry and broadcasters, said ITU Space Services Department Chief Alexandre Vallet. Mohaned Juwad, Intelsat senior manager-spectrum policy, said French and Czech Republic C-band auctions are delayed and auctions in Austria, Portugal and elsewhere could become behind schedule. He said those changes, atop disruptions to the mobile handset supply chain and particularly from China, could mean 5G progress gets slowed. Whether delays affect bid prices, “Who knows?” said Ethan Lavan, Eutelsat orbital resources director. Inmarsat Spectrum Regulation Director Paul Deedman said added time for C-band auctions could give the satellite industry a temporary respite from moving earth stations. UHF spectrum for IMT will be a huge focus of 2023 WRC, said Vallet. While quite important for broadcasters, the band is ideal for improving mobile network coverage, he said. Vallet said parts of the C band for IMT use also will be a focus of WRC-2023. Juwad said regulators have somewhat recognized a lot of spectrum is available for IMT and there's a need to get justification before allocation. ITU is early in organizing for WRC-2023 so the pandemic timing shouldn’t significantly disrupt the planning cycle, said Vallet. The next 24 months “will be challenging, no doubt,” for the satellite-provided in-flight connectivity market for satellite, Juwad said. Contracts are delayed, not canceled, he said, saying demand for uplink traffic will increase once the market rebounds.
The Senate Commerce Committee and Senate Appropriations Financial Services Subcommittee are close to setting two FCC-related June hearings, the panels’ chairmen told us Thursday. Senate Commerce is “looking at” holding a hearing mid-month on FCC Commissioner Mike O’Rielly’s nomination to another term, though it’s “not scheduled yet,” said Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss. “It’s definitely on our agenda.” Lobbyists told us the most likely hearing date appears to be June 16, though it’s not a certainty. President Donald Trump renominated O’Rielly in March to a term ending June 30, 2024 (see 2003180070). O’Rielly’s current term ended in June 2019, but he can remain on the commission until this Congress ends at the beginning of 2021. Communications sector officials and lobbyists believe O’Rielly has a good chance of confirmation (see 2004030072). Wicker told us he’s still eyeing a Senate Commerce hearing on the FCC's Ligado L-band plan approval, which drew the ire of the House and Senate Armed Services committees and some other lawmakers (see 2005210043). Lobbyists said Senate Commerce hasn’t indicated a timeline for the hearing. Senate Appropriations Financial Services Chairman John Kennedy, R-La., indicated a planned follow-up hearing on his concerns about the FCC’s plans for auctioning the 3.7-4.2 GHz C band is likely “in the next couple weeks,” as expected (see 2005270034). “I’ve asked” Senate Appropriations Financial Services Majority Staff Director Andrew Newton “to get it scheduled,” Kennedy told us. The panel is “at a minimum” going to include testimony from FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, though “there will be others.”
With “lots of first-time users” signing up during the pandemic, “as a CEO, I think I should have done a better job” managing the security and privacy issues, said Zoom's Eric Yuan. He wishes in hindsight the company had offered more tech support for novice customers, he said on a fiscal Q1 call Tuesday: “This is a mistake I made. So we learned a hard lesson.” The quarter ended April 30. COVID-19 stay-at-home mandates enabled Zoom to peak at more than 300 million daily meeting participants that month, up from 10 million in December, said Yuan. “We continue to see elevated levels of participants even as governments around the world have begun to ease stay-in-place restrictions.” The stock closed up 7.6% higher Wednesday at $223.87. Yuan acknowledged the “negative PR” that Zoom endured about security and privacy after demand spiked. “With good intentions, we opened our platform to unprecedented numbers of first-time users” who lacked the “established protocols for security and privacy” that were endemic to more seasoned “enterprise customers,” he said. Zoom since has “transparently and quickly addressed specific security and privacy issues,” he said. The company blogged about its improvements, amid some criticism (see 2004070053).
Now that the comment cycle is complete, move on proposals to allow TV white spaces (TVWS) devices to operate with higher power in less-congested areas, Microsoft and other commenters asked the FCC. Others continue to raise concerns (see 2005050033). Replies were posted through Wednesday in docket 20-36 on an NPRM that commissioners approved 5-0 in February (see 2002280055). Make the changes discussed in the NPRM but address other changes in future items, Microsoft replied. There's broad support for TVWS changes from service providers, tech companies, businesses and schools in rural areas and public interest organizations, the company said: “The record also demonstrates that the proposed rule changes will accelerate the pace of TVWS deployments and significantly improve the ability of TVWS technology to narrow the digital divide.” There's broad agreement “more robust rules” here “would improve connectivity in rural, tribal, and other unserved and underserved areas,” the Public Interest Spectrum Coalition said. New America’s Open Technology Institute, Public Knowledge, Consumer Reports, Access Humboldt, Next Century Cities, Common Cause, the Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition and Benton Institute for Broadband and Society were among those on the filing. “Limit this proceeding to the narrow set of proposals set forth in the NPRM” and don't “consider extraneous requests that would dramatically expand those proposals or effectively rewrite Part 15 of the Commission’s rules,” NAB said. Some would expand the proceeding to consider “areas that have already been fully debated and where there have been no new developments that would warrant changes,” the group said. The National Public Safety Telecommunications Council endorsed the changes in general for rural areas, seeking companion tweaks for private land mobile radio operations on TV channels 14-20. NPSTC is “simply seeking to maintain an equivalent level of protection to that offered today,” the group said: “The proposed doubling of the allowed TVWS antenna height will have a significant effect on the separation distance needed to maintain an equivalent level of protection” to public land mobile radio operations. Wireless mic makers kept up their concerns. “Refine the movable platforms proposal by narrowing the scope of eligible vehicles and accounting for antenna height and directionality in the design of the rules,” Shure said: “Retain the less congested areas framework while rejecting impractical/computationally intensive alternative proposals centered around population density and/or terrain-based modeling.”
Staying the FCC's Ligado approval won't cause harm but is needed to prevent serious harm from harmful interference to GPS devices and satellite communications, said nearly six dozen aeronautical, GPS and satellite interests in a docket 11-109 posting Wednesday. Citing NTIA concerns about Ligado's L-band terrestrial wireless plan, the coalition said the FCC "made little, if any, cognizable effort to accommodate or address those concerns. Letter signatories included American Airlines, American Meteorological Society, FedEx, Iridium, JetBlue, National Emergency Number Association, Spire Global, Trimble and UPS. The FCC, which was asked to reconsider the approval (see 2005210043), didn't comment. The Association of Equipment Manufacturers said that in a meeting with an aide to Commissioner Geoffrey Starks it urged reconsideration of the Ligado approval, noting the harmful interference to GPS.
The “consumer-facing pop” for Wi-Fi 6 device introductions will be “relatively short term,” perhaps even in time for the 2020 holiday season, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai told the Wi-Fi Alliance’s virtual membership meeting Tuesday. “This is not a case in which a year-one decision may yield results in a decade.” He cited the agency making 1,200 MHz of bandwidth available (see 2005260025). The new standard is rolling out, said Pai. It will be more than 2.5 times faster than current Wi-Fi and “will offer better performance for connected devices,” he said. Qualcomm launched such products last month (see 2005280046). Wi-Fi 6 is “such a big deal” partly because Wi-Fi “has become such a big deal,” said Pai. It carries more than half the internet’s overall traffic, he said. “Offloading mobile data traffic to Wi-Fi is vital to keeping our cellular networks from being overwhelmed.” COVID-19 "amplified how indispensable Wi-Fi has become,” said Pai.
Calls for the FCC to reconsider its approval of Ligado's terrestrial L-band network plans (see 2005280005) got backers and opponents in docket 11-109 postings Tuesday. Deere doesn't object to Ligado's terrestrial L-band network under the technical parameters laid out in the FCC approval, but contended the commission wrongly characterized it as endorsing the plan. It said it backed petitions for reconsideration of the approval that would substitute the 1 dB standard of GPS interference protection instead of "the impracticable 'performance-based' metric" the FCC went with. The recon petitions don't bring up new evidence that would justify reconsideration, Ligado consultant Roberson and Associates said. The various recon arguments -- including that 1 dB standard is more appropriate and that the GPS compatibility tests don't show GPS devices can operate without harm -- lack factual basis and are contrary to evidence presented in the order, it said. The Brattle Group, also a Ligado consultant, said the FCC “appropriately weighed the benefits and costs” of the license modifications. “The 23 MHz guard band, reduced power levels, and other conditions imposed on Ligado’s ATC network operations will drive down the potential cost of allowing low-power terrestrial deployment nearly to zero, as there appear to be limited interference concerns,” Brattle said: “Any potential remaining costs decline with time as they are mitigated and the stock of GPS devices turns over.” Aviation consultant JHW Unmanned Solutions countered arguments the modifications pose a threat to air safety. The FCC’s order “appropriately accepted the analyses of the Federal Aviation Administration, the expert Federal agency on issues regarding potential interference with aviation GPS devices and, more broadly, aviation safety,” the firm said: "Petitioners advance no legitimate challenge to the Order’s comprehensive analysis of these issues nor do they provide any new information.” Backers and opponents of Ligado's terrestrial wireless plans "seem to be talking past each other," with each side seemingly convinced it's in the right and puzzled by the opposition, the Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation blogged Monday, citing letters from FCC Chairman Ajit Pai to House Armed Services Committee members (see 2005270045). The problem is "fundamental disconnects" in interpreting data, and there should be an independent expert evaluation of test results and a cost-benefit analysis, it said. Ligado said the FCC "fully consulted" with NTIA, considered its views and correctly rejected the proposed 1 dB standard, evaluating harmful interference by measuring actual performance.