US, Glycine Petitioner Agree to Dismiss Case Challenging Denial of Scope Ruling Request
The U.S. and domestic producer Deer Park Glycine jointly agreed Sept. 17 to dismiss the producer’s 2024 case against a scope ruling request denial (Deer Park Glycine v. U.S., CIT # 24-00016).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
Deer Park Glycine has been challenging the Commerce Department’s refusal to include calcium glycinate, a precursor to dried crystalline glycine, under antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on dried crystalline glycine from India or China. In two cases, Deer Park challenged both a scope ruling by Commerce that calcium glycine isn’t covered and the department’s refusal to make a second scope ruling that the petitioner requested a few months later (see 2406070069) and (2407240017).
Without prejudice, the parties agreed to dismiss the case challenging the scope request denial.