FCC IG Report Clears Pai on White House Contacts Over Sinclair/Tribune
An investigation by the FCC inspector general didn’t reveal any evidence FCC Chairman Ajit Pai acted improperly by not volunteering that he had been called by then-White House Counsel Don McGahn in connection with Sinclair's since-abandoned deal for Tribune (see…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
1812030055), said a Nov. 26 report released Monday. “We are pleased that the Office of Inspector General has confirmed for a second time that there were no improper actions taken during the Sinclair-Tribune review process,” said the agency, calling allegations against Pai “spurious.” During a July House oversight hearing, ranking member Frank Pallone, D-N.J., asked Pai if he would make public any discussions with President Donald Trump or White House staff about Sinclair/Tribune transaction. Pai said he would, within ex parte rules, but didn’t mention a phone call with McGahn about the deal that took place just a few days before the hearing, according to the report. “Although Chairman Pai could have disclosed his discussion with White House Counsel McGahn in response to this question, we do not believe that Chairman Pai made a ‘material omission,’” the report said. Pai wasn’t required to disclose the conversation under ex parte rules because McGahn didn’t express any views on merits of the proceeding, the IG said. McGahn asked what action Pai was taking, and Pai explained he had proposed designating the matter for hearing, as he had already publicly announced, the report said. Pai later disclosed the call at an August oversight hearing. The Pallone letter that triggered the IG investigation also referenced an August FCC news conference where Pai was asked if anyone in the White House had contacted him or FCC staff about the deal, and Pai replied: “No one in the White House has contacted us to express a view about the merger.” Laws prohibiting false statements don't cover comments to the media and “therefore no further analysis of this exchange is warranted,” the report said. By offering Congress “truthful but incomplete” answers, Pai demonstrated a lack of candor, the same issue over which Sinclair/Tribune was designated for hearing, said Georgetown Institute for Legal Representation Senior Counselor Andrew Schwartzman. The FCC didn't comment.