NAB, ACDDE Members Don't Agree on Incubator Program
NAB and members of the FCC Advisory Committee on Diversity and Digital Empowerment (ACDDE) disagreed in filings posted Thursday to docket 17-289 about the best way to do a broadcast incubator program. The FCC should institute a program that doesn’t…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
depend on congressionally authorized tax credits and avoids limiting joint sales and shared services agreements, NAB told Media Bureau Chief Michelle Carey in a Monday meeting, said a filing. NAB “supports the FCC’s adoption of a fully-formed incubator program at this time, rather than one that is contingent on future Congressional action that may or may not occur,” said the filing. Incentivizing incubators with ownership rule waivers would “plunge” the program “into the politics of broadcasting’s ‘100 Years War’” over media ownership, said late replies by 22 individual members of the ACDDE, the body’s Broadcast Development Working Group. Limitations on sharing arrangements between incubator participants would prevent abuse, the committee members said. Since rules don’t limit broadcasters not involved in incubator programs from such relationships, harsher rules shouldn’t be imposed on incubator participants, NAB said. It favors a “new entrant” standard in deciding who would be eligible to be incubated, but the committee members said the FCC should use the “Overcoming Disadvantages Preference,” a mechanism for designating eligible entities that could survive constitutional challenges. The committees and NAB also had some agreements, with the association agreeing “Native Nations” is a possible race neutral standard that could be used by the agency, and the committee members agreeing with several NAB suggestions about how an incubator program could be operated.