China Diamond Sawblades: Final Results of AD Admin Review
The Commerce Department issued the final results of its antidumping duty administrative review on diamond sawblades from China (A-570-900). The agency made no changes to its preliminary results, assigning 10 companies to the China-wide entity, with an AD rate of 82.05%, and also using that rate for another 20 companies that qualified for a separate rate but were not individually examined in the review. The new 82.05% cash deposit rate for these 30 companies takes effect for each on April 20. Commerce will also assess duties at this rate on subject merchandise exported from these companies and entered between Nov. 1, 2015, and Oct. 31, 2016.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
The 10 companies Commerce found did not cooperate and assigned to the China wide entity include Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., as well as Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., and its affiliates Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd., and also ASHINE Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd., Hebei XMF Tools Group Co., Ltd., Henan Huanghe Whirlwind Co., Ltd., Henan Huanghe Whirlwind International Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Hao Xin International Group Limited, Pantos Logistics (HK) Company Limited, and Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
The 20 companies Commerce found demonstrated independence from Chinese government control but were not individually examined and were nonetheless assigned the 82.05% rate include: Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.; Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.; Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd.; Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity; Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd.; Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.; Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd.; Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd.; Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Starcraft Tools Company Limited; Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.; Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.; Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd.; and Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd.
Commerce also determined that 10 companies did not have any shipments to the U.S. during the period of review, as follows: Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd.; Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Huachang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Orient Gain International Limited; Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.; Sino Tools Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd.; Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation; and Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd. AD duty cash deposit rates for these 10 companies will not change as a result of this review, and any entries under their case numbers during the period of review will be liquidated at the China-wide rate.
(The period of review is 11/01/15 - 10/31/16. See Commerce's notice for more information, including the scope of the order, detailed cash deposit and assessment instructions, etc. See 1712050069 for a summary of the preliminary results of this administrative review.)
AD/CVD Operations contact -- Yang Jin Chun (202) 482-5760
(Federal Register 04/20/18)