Telcos Ask FCC to Complete Shift to Bill-and-Keep in IP Switch
AT&T, Sprint, Verizon and the Voice on the Net Coalition urged the FCC to complete an intercarrier compensation move to bill-and-keep arrangements under which carriers don't charge each other for exchanging traffic, and speed the transition to IP-based networks. Rural…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
telcos urged a more cautious approach. Comments were posted Thursday and Friday in docket 01-92 on a public notice seeking to refresh the record as a phaseout of many terminating charges continues under a 2011 overhaul. Sprint remains "concerned that [LECs] will be reluctant (or even refuse) to enter into far more efficient IP interconnection arrangements" as long as they can collect access charges. AT&T and Verizon also commented. Many ILECs exchange much voice traffic in "highly inefficient TDM-based arrangements," forcing cable companies to "spend millions of dollars every year converting IP-based voice traffic," said NCTA. It urged "incentives for completing the transition to an all IP-environment." T-Mobile said the agency should create such incentives, scrap rules slowing the IP transition, and convene a federal-state board to work with industry to consolidate interconnection points. "Correct this asymmetry by adopting rules permitting all tandem owners to be compensated equally for the use of their networks -- thereby establishing the end office as the proper default network edge for all providers," recommended CenturyLink. ITTA said carriers should be required to "make one or more network edge point(s) available such that carriers that interconnect at that point will pay nothing to the terminating carrier for terminating the traffic." NTCA and WTA sought action only after high-cost USF "budget shortfalls" are addressed. Any subsequent "reforms" should create certainty about "network 'edge' transport obligations, while protecting rural consumers," the RLEC groups said. "Facilitate IP-to-IP interconnection by providing stable and clear 'rules of the road' governing all underlying network technologies." HD Tandem sought an IP-based transition with "regulatory glide paths."