Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of Sept. 25 - Oct. 1
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Sept. 25 - Oct. 1:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
L&N Trading, on the assessment of AD duties on its imports of honey from Malaysia. L&N says CBP improperly determined the honey was of Chinese origin and subject to the AD duty order on honey from China. #17-00242. Filed Sept. 27.
Iron Bow Technologies and Vivify Health, challenging a recent CBP ruling that found its tablet computers made in Vietnam and programmed with proprietary software in the U.S. are of Vietnamese origin for government procurement purposes (see 1708250019). #17-00243. Filed Sept. 27.
Sumecht NA, dba Sumec North America, challenging Commerce's decision to order assessment of AD duties at 238.95% on its imported solar cells from China. Sumec said the new rate was improper because Commerce had not yet issued a "Timken notice" announcing the high rate, which was the result of a CIT decision from before the merchandise was entered. #17-00244. Filed Sept. 29.
​Appeals of CIT Decisions
The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Sept. 25 - Oct. 1:
ITG Voma Corporation, China Rubber Industry Association and Sub-Committee of Tire Producers of the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemical Importers, challenging a July CIT decision sustaining the International Trade Commission's final affirmative injury determination in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. #17-2618, -2619. Opened Sept. 27.