Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of May 1-7
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of May 1-7:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
Shandong Dongfang Bayley Wood Co., Ltd., challenging the Commerce Department's decision to assign a penalty rate to the company in the preliminary determination of the countervailing duty investigation on hardwood plywood from China. #17-094. Filed May 2.
Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd., challenging the International Trade Commission's final injury determination in the antidumping and countervailing duty injury investigations on stainless steel sheet and strip from China. #17-095. Filed May 3.
Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd., and TISCO Trading U.S.A. Inc., challenging Commerce's final determination in the antidumping duty investigation on stainless steel sheet and strip from China. #17-096. Filed May 3.
Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd., and TISCO Trading U.S.A. Inc., challenging Commerce's final determination in the countervailing duty investigation on stainless steel sheet and strip from China. #17-097. Filed May 3.
Magid Glove & Safety Manufacturing, on the classification of knit fabric gloves covered in polyurethane. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 6116.10.5520 (13.2%). Magid says it should have instead been classified under subheading 3926.20.1050 (free). #17-098. Filed May 4.
Lockhart Textiles Inc., on the classification of ladies' slacks made with metallized yarn. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 6104.63.20.11 (28.2%). Lockhart says it should have instead been classified under subheading 6104.69.80.38 (5.6%). #17-099. Filed May 4.
Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd., and Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-100. Filed May 4.
Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd., and Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's countervailing duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014. #17-101. Filed May 4.
Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-102. Filed May 4.
Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International Trading Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-103. Filed May 4.
Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-104. Filed May 5.
Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's countervailing duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014. #17-105. Filed May 5.
​Appeals of CIT Decisions
The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of May 1-7:
Apex Frozen Foods Private Limited and 30 other Indian exporters, challenging a March 2 CIT decision sustaining the final results of the 2013-14 antidumping duty administrative review on frozen warmwater shrimp from India. 16-1789. Opened May 4.