Communications Daily is a service of Warren Communications News.

Proposed No-Excess Supply Restriction Could Reduce Bidding in Incentive Auction, AT&T Expert Says

The FCC should reject a proposed incentive auction rule that would prevent a bidder from reducing the quantity of blocks it demands in a category if the reduction will result in aggregate demand falling below the available supply of licenses…

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!

in the category, said AT&T. Its filing includes a paper written by Yale economics professor Philip Haile. He called the provision a no-excess supply (NES) restriction. “For many bidders, licenses are complementary, which means that their per-license valuations are higher for pairs of licenses than for a single license,” the paper said. The NES restriction “makes it dangerous for a bidder to risk bidding any price above” its lower single-license valuation, he wrote. Doing so creates “substantial risk of being forced to choose between two money-losing options: (1) purchase a single license at a price exceeding its standalone value; or (2) buy the pair of licenses at a total price exceeding their value.” Because of the risk, bidders may bid more conservatively and drop their bids earlier, he said. A second paper by Haile opposes a U.S. Cellular proposal for using a point system to determine which licenses in the 600 MHz band a bidder will be assigned after the TV incentive auction (see 1504240023). U.S. Cellular’s proposal to give each bidder the same number of points in each market “would give a systematic and unwarranted advantage to bidders that have fewer feasible allocations,” Haile wrote in the second filing, which also is in docket 12-268. The carrier’s alternative proposal, in which bidders would “score” their preferences in each market, “would systematically disadvantage bidders seeking to build larger (e.g., 10x10 MHz) blocks of spectrum, and such a system also would not provide enough information about the intensity of bidders’ preferences,” Haile said.