Lobbying for and against media ownership deregulation continued, docket 09-182...

same major market, and ending limits on common ownership of a radio and TV station in a market (CD Nov 13 p1). Genachowski hadn’t circulated an order as of Tuesday, agency officials told us. A coalition of 200 groups including AARP, Common Cause, National Council of La Raza and unions (http://xrl.us/bnzhvr) asked the agency to not allow more broadcaster consolidation without the data its letter said the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last summer required “analyzing the impact of media consolidation on communities of color and women.” Any change in ownership rules “should take place only after the Commission collects, releases, and subjects to public comment complete data and analysis of broadcast ownership data,” the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights wrote. The Media Bureau hadn’t planned to release for public comment broadcast ownership Form 323s, though the bureau prepared a report and agency and industry officials said it’s still expected to release it (CD Oct 18 p1). It’s “a grave disservice to the constituencies represented by The Leadership Conference to attempt to push through a change in media ownership rules at the last minute without an opportunity for our members to sift through the data and engage in substantive debate about its import,” the group wrote (http://xrl.us/bnzhu6). A bureau spokeswoman had no comment. Bonneville International, Morris Communications and Scranton Times LP were among those asking the FCC to end limits on common ownership of radio stations and dailies in the same market. Former FCC Chairman Richard Wiley of Wiley Rein and Morris CEO William Morris met with commissioners Robert McDowell, Ajit Pai and Jessica Rosenworcel, with aides to Genachowski and with Chief Bill Lake and others in the bureau. “Absent relief from the newspaper/radio cross-ownership rule, the high level of local news and informational programming offered by existing newspaper/radio combinations” such as Morris owns in Amarillo, Texas, and Topeka, Kan., “would likely be lost,” the company said (http://xrl.us/bnzhwf). Newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rules are a “regulatory relic,” the Newspaper Association of America wrote (http://xrl.us/bnzhww). The cross-ownership ban “suppresses crucial investment in local journalism,” NAA said. The commission has been given “no factual foundation, or even serious legal argument, for keeping the newspaper/radio restriction,” lawyers for Bonneville and Scranton Times told an aide to Commissioner Mignon Clyburn (http://xrl.us/bnzhw8). Multichannel video programming distributors seeking changes to retransmission consent regulations again asked the agency to make it a retrans rule violation when separately owned TV stations coordinate carriage talks. “The Commission should clarify that any agreement, formal or informal and however styled, that directly or indirectly gives a third party the right to negotiate retransmission consent for that station constitutes a ’transfer of control'” needing FCC approval and/or being considered an attributable ownership interest, MVPDs reported telling Pai. American Cable Association, Cablevision, DirecTV, Dish Network, Time Warner Cable and USTelecom executives attended (http://xrl.us/bnzhxt).