Comments are due Sept. 8 on a MusicFIRST Coalition petition for a...
Comments are due Sept. 8 on a MusicFIRST Coalition petition for an FCC investigation into allegations stemming from a fight over performance royalties. The coalition asked the commission to look into whether radio stations have been “targeting and threatening”…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
recording artists who have supported creating a performance royalty for terrestrial radio, a public notice said. The notice asks whether and how stations have targeted those artists, “including a refusal to air” their music. It also seeks comment on allegations that stations have refused to run ads that support the royalty, whether the NAB is leading a media campaign “which disseminates falsities” about the royalty, and whether some stations are evading public-file requirements by calling their on-air spots against the royalties PSAs. “We recognize that substantial First Amendment interests are involved in the examination of speech of any kind, and it is not clear whether remedies are necessary or available to address the actions alleged by MusicFIRST,” the notice said. Replies are due Sept. 23. MusicFIRST praised the commission for proceeding. The allegations raise troubling questions about broadcasters abusing the public interests, said Media Access Project CEO Andrew Schwartzman. “If these allegations are proven to be true, they will raise questions as to whether some radio stations deserve to receive free licenses for exclusive use of the public’s airwaves,” he said. The NAB said it will file comments in the proceeding and correct the “distortions” raised by the petition. “Contrary to suggestions in the petition, broadcasters are under no obligation to carry everything that is offered or suggested to them,” a spokesman said.